[PATCH v4 1/4] RISC-V: Add Bitmanip/Scalar Crypto parsing from DT
Evan Green
evan at rivosinc.com
Wed Jul 12 10:43:33 PDT 2023
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 3:39 AM Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com> wrote:
>
> Hey Samuel, Evan,
>
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 10:41:17AM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> > From: "Hongren (Zenithal) Zheng" <i at zenithal.me>
> >
> > Parse Zb/Zk related string from DT and output them to cpuinfo.
>
> One thing that has sprung to mind is that this is not limited to DT
> anymore, since the information could in theory come from ACPI too.
> Ditto the title I guess.
>
> > It is worth noting that the Scalar Crypto extension defines "zk" as a
> > shorthand for the Zkn, Zkr and Zkt extensions. Since the Zkn one also
> > implies the Zbkb, Zbkc and Zbkx extensions, simply passing the valid
> > "zk" extension name through a DT will enable all of the Zbkb, Zbkc,
> > Zbkx, Zkn, Zkr and Zkt extensions.
> >
> > Also, since there currently is no mechanism to merge all enabled
> > extensions, the generated cpuinfo output could be relatively large.
> > For example, setting the "riscv,isa" DT property to "rv64imafdc_zk_zks"
> > will generate the following cpuinfo output:
> > "rv64imafdc_zbkb_zbkc_zbkx_zknd_zkne_zknh_zkr_zksed_zksh_zkt".
>
> On that note, I've created another version of what checking for
> supersets could look like, since it'll be needed either by my series or
> this one, depending on what gets merged first. I've yet to test the
> dedicated extensions part of it, but I wanted to get this out before I
> went looking at other fixes in the area.
>
> Evan, since it was you that commented on this stuff last time around,
> could you take another look? I'm still not keen on the "subset_of"
> arrays, but they're an improvement on what I had last time around for
> sure.
>
This looks alright to me. At the risk of getting into bikeshedding
territory, the only awkward bit of it is it composes the extensions in
sort of the opposite way you'd expect. I tend to think of Zks as being
comprised of {zbkb, zbkc, zksed, zksh}, rather than zbkb being a part
of {zks, zkn, zk}, though both are of course correct. Here's an
untested version of the other way. You can decide if you like it
better or worse than what you've got, and I'm fine either way. Sorry
gmail mangles it, if you want the patch for real I can get it to you:
>From e201c34c05cd82812b5b3f47ccdd7d5909259f07 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Evan Green <evan at rivosinc.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 10:36:15 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] WIP: RISC-V: Allow support for bundled extensions, and add Zk*
---
arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h | 13 ++++++
arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
2 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
index b7b58258f6c7..7d2d10b42cf3 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
@@ -58,6 +58,17 @@
#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICSR 40
#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIFENCEI 41
#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIHPM 42
+#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBC 43
+#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKB 44
+#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKC 45
+#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKX 46
+#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKND 47
+#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKNE 48
+#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKNH 49
+#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKR 50
+#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKSED 51
+#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKSH 52
+#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKT 53
#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX 64
@@ -77,6 +88,8 @@ struct riscv_isa_ext_data {
const unsigned int id;
const char *name;
const char *property;
+ const unsigned int *bundled_exts;
+ const unsigned int bundle_size;
};
extern const struct riscv_isa_ext_data riscv_isa_ext[];
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 5945dfc5f806..2a1f958c1777 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -105,6 +105,39 @@ static bool riscv_isa_extension_check(int id)
.id = _id, \
}
+#define __RISCV_ISA_EXT_BUNDLE(_name, _bundled_exts) { \
+ .name = #_name, \
+ .property = #_name, \
+ .bundled_exts = _bundled_exts, \
+ .bundle_size = ARRAY_SIZE(_bundled_exts) \
+}
+
+static const unsigned int riscv_zk_bundled_exts[] = {
+ RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKB,
+ RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKC,
+ RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKX,
+ RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKND,
+ RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKNE,
+ RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKR,
+ RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKT,
+};
+
+static const unsigned int riscv_zkn_bundled_exts[] = {
+ RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKB,
+ RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKC,
+ RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKX,
+ RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKND,
+ RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKNE,
+ RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKNH,
+};
+
+static const unsigned int riscv_zks_bundled_exts[] = {
+ RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKB,
+ RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKC,
+ RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKSED,
+ RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKSH
+};
+
/*
* The canonical order of ISA extension names in the ISA string is defined in
* chapter 27 of the unprivileged specification.
@@ -167,7 +200,20 @@ const struct riscv_isa_ext_data riscv_isa_ext[] = {
__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zihpm, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIHPM),
__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zba, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBA),
__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zbb, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB),
+ __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zbc, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBC),
+ __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zbkb, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKB),
+ __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zbkc, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKC),
+ __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zbkx, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKX),
__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zbs, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBS),
+ __RISCV_ISA_EXT_BUNDLE(zk, riscv_zk_bundled_exts),
+ __RISCV_ISA_EXT_BUNDLE(zkn, riscv_zkn_bundled_exts),
+ __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zknd, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKND),
+ __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zkne, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKNE),
+ __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zknh, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKNH),
+ __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zkr, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKR),
+ __RISCV_ISA_EXT_BUNDLE(zks, riscv_zks_bundled_exts),
+ __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zksed, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKSED),
+ __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zksh, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKSH),
__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(smaia, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SMAIA),
__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(ssaia, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSAIA),
__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(sscofpmf, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSCOFPMF),
@@ -179,6 +225,30 @@ const struct riscv_isa_ext_data riscv_isa_ext[] = {
const size_t riscv_isa_ext_count = ARRAY_SIZE(riscv_isa_ext);
+static void match_isa_ext(const struct riscv_isa_ext_data *ext, const
char *name,
+ const char *name_end, struct riscv_isainfo *isainfo)
+{
+ if ((name_end - name == strlen(ext->name)) &&
+ !strncasecmp(name, ext->name, name_end - name)) {
+
+ /*
+ * If this is a bundle, enable all the ISA extensions that
+ * comprise the bundle.
+ */
+ if (ext->bundle_size) {
+ unsigned int i;
+ for (i = 0; i < ext->bundle_size; i++) {
+ if
(riscv_isa_extension_check(ext->bundled_exts[i]))
+ set_bit(ext->bundled_exts[i],
isainfo->isa);
+ }
+
+
+ } else if (riscv_isa_extension_check(ext->id)) {
+ set_bit(ext->id, isainfo->isa);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
static void __init riscv_parse_isa_string(unsigned long *this_hwcap,
struct riscv_isainfo *isainfo,
unsigned long *isa2hwcap,
const char *isa)
{
@@ -310,14 +380,6 @@ static void __init
riscv_parse_isa_string(unsigned long *this_hwcap, struct risc
if (*isa == '_')
++isa;
-#define SET_ISA_EXT_MAP(name, bit)
\
- do {
\
- if ((ext_end - ext == sizeof(name) - 1) &&
\
- !strncasecmp(ext, name, sizeof(name) - 1)
&& \
- riscv_isa_extension_check(bit))
\
- set_bit(bit, isainfo->isa);
\
- } while (false)
\
-
if (unlikely(ext_err))
continue;
if (!ext_long) {
@@ -329,10 +391,8 @@ static void __init
riscv_parse_isa_string(unsigned long *this_hwcap, struct risc
}
} else {
for (int i = 0; i < riscv_isa_ext_count; i++)
- SET_ISA_EXT_MAP(riscv_isa_ext[i].name,
- riscv_isa_ext[i].id);
+ match_isa_ext(&riscv_isa_ext[i], ext,
ext_end, isainfo);
}
-#undef SET_ISA_EXT_MAP
}
}
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list