[PATCH] Documentation: riscv: fix insufficient list item indent

[Conor Dooley]

From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>

When adding the ISA string ordering rules, I didn't sufficiently indent
one of the list items.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp at intel.com>
Fixes: f07b2b3f9d47 ("Documentation: riscv: add a section about ISA string ordering in /proc/cpuinfo")
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
---
 Documentation/riscv/uabi.rst | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/riscv/uabi.rst b/Documentation/riscv/uabi.rst
index 2ebec4c52230..8960fac42c40 100644
--- a/Documentation/riscv/uabi.rst
+++ b/Documentation/riscv/uabi.rst
@@ -21,10 +21,10 @@ so for our purposes the following rules apply:
    single-letter extensions and before any higher-privileged extensions.
 
 #. For additional standard extensions, the first letter following the 'Z'
-  conventionally indicates the most closely related alphabetical
-  extension category. If multiple 'Z' extensions are named, they will be ordered
-  first by category, in canonical order, as listed above, then alphabetically
-  within a category.
+   conventionally indicates the most closely related alphabetical
+   extension category. If multiple 'Z' extensions are named, they will be
+   ordered first by category, in canonical order, as listed above, then
+   alphabetically within a category.
 
 #. Standard supervisor-level extensions (starting with 'S') will be listed
    after standard unprivileged extensions.  If multiple supervisor-level
-- 
2.39.1