[RFC 2/2] RISC-V: enable building the 64-bit kernels with rust support
Conor Dooley
conor.dooley at microchip.com
Fri Feb 24 05:39:54 PST 2023
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 01:36:10PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> From: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda at kernel.org>
>
> The rust modules work on 64-bit RISC-V, with no twiddling required.
> Select HAS_RUST and provide the required flags to kbuild so that the
> modules can be used.
> 32-bit is broken in core rust code, so support is limited to 64-bit
> only: ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __udivdi3
>
> Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda at kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
> ---
> Documentation/rust/arch-support.rst | 2 ++
> arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/riscv/Makefile | 3 ++-
> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/rust/arch-support.rst b/Documentation/rust/arch-support.rst
> index 6982b63775da..197919158596 100644
> --- a/Documentation/rust/arch-support.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/rust/arch-support.rst
> @@ -15,5 +15,7 @@ support corresponds to ``S`` values in the ``MAINTAINERS`` file.
> ============ ================ ==============================================
> Architecture Level of support Constraints
> ============ ================ ==============================================
> +``riscv`` Maintained ``rv64`` only.
> +============ ================ ==============================================
> ``x86`` Maintained ``x86_64`` only.
> ============ ================ ==============================================
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> index 81eb031887d2..73174157212d 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> @@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ config RISCV
> select HAVE_POSIX_CPU_TIMERS_TASK_WORK
> select HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API
> select HAVE_RSEQ
> + select HAVE_RUST if 64BIT
> select HAVE_STACKPROTECTOR
> select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
> select IRQ_DOMAIN
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Makefile b/arch/riscv/Makefile
> index 76989561566b..f8b3f58f2e40 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Makefile
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_RV64I),y)
>
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += -mabi=lp64
> KBUILD_AFLAGS += -mabi=lp64
> -
> + KBUILD_RUSTFLAGS += -Ctarget-cpu=generic-rv64
Obviously it was only *after* sending this that I realised I had added
these asymmetrically. Ah well, it's only an RFC that needs resubmission
before acceptance anyway...
> KBUILD_LDFLAGS += -melf64lriscv
> else
> BITS := 32
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ else
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += -mabi=ilp32
> KBUILD_AFLAGS += -mabi=ilp32
> KBUILD_LDFLAGS += -melf32lriscv
> + KBUILD_RUSTFLAGS += -Ctarget-cpu=generic-rv32
> endif
>
> ifeq ($(CONFIG_LD_IS_LLD),y)
> --
> 2.39.2
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20230224/543d4ac1/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list