[PATCH 2/3] riscv: Set dma_default_coherent to true
Jiaxun Yang
jiaxun.yang at flygoat.com
Wed Feb 22 08:20:16 PST 2023
> 2023年2月22日 16:02,Conor Dooley <conor at kernel.org> 写道:
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 03:55:19PM +0000, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
>>
>>
>>> 2023年2月22日 14:50,Conor Dooley <conor at kernel.org> 写道:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 01:37:11PM +0000, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
>>>> For riscv our assumption is unless a device states it is non-coherent,
>>>> we take it to be DMA coherent.
>>>>
>>>> For devicetree probed devices that have been true since very begining
>>>> with OF_DMA_DEFAULT_COHERENT selected.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang at flygoat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 3 +++
>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
>>>> index 376d2827e736..34b371180976 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
>>>> @@ -300,6 +300,9 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>>>> riscv_init_cbom_blocksize();
>>>> riscv_fill_hwcap();
>>>> apply_boot_alternatives();
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT
>>>> + dma_default_coherent = true;
>>>> +#endif
>>>
>>> Do we really need to add ifdeffery for this here?
>>> It's always coherent by default, so why do we need to say set it in
>>> setup_arch() when we know that, regardless of options, it is true?
>>
>> Because this symbol is only a variable when:
>>
>> defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SYNC_DMA_FOR_DEVICE) || \
>> defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SYNC_DMA_FOR_CPU) || \
>> defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SYNC_DMA_FOR_CPU_ALL)
>>
>> Which is only true if CONFIG_RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT is selected.
>>
>> Otherwise this symbol is defined to true and we can’t make a assignment to it.
>
> Maybe I am just slow today, but I don't get why you need to add
> ifdeffery to setup_arch() to do something that is always true.
> Why can't you just set this in riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c? What am I
> missing?
Hmm that sounds like a good idea but I was unable to find a place for this.
riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c are just a bunch of callbacks, there is no initialisation
function that will always run on every boot. riscv_noncoherent_supported is only
called conditionally.
Perhaps I can add a initcall in dma-noncoherent.c but it seems to be a little bit
overkilling.
Actually I’d prefer to have a config option for the default value but it seems like
it’s not in Christoph’s flavour.
Thanks
- Jiaxun
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list