[PATCH v3 07/11] dt-bindings: clock: Add StarFive JH7110 system clock and reset generator
Conor Dooley
conor at kernel.org
Thu Feb 16 10:20:34 PST 2023
Hey Hal!
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 10:42:20PM +0800, Hal Feng wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Dec 2022 20:15:20 +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 26, 2022 at 12:26:32AM +0800, Hal Feng wrote:
> >> On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 23:14:39 +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 08:50:50AM +0800, Hal Feng wrote:
> >> > > From: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel at esmil.dk>
> >> > >
> >> > > Add bindings for the system clock and reset generator (SYSCRG) on the
> >> > > JH7110 RISC-V SoC by StarFive Ltd.
> >> > >
> >> > > Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel at esmil.dk>
> >> > > Signed-off-by: Hal Feng <hal.feng at starfivetech.com>
> >
> >> > > + clocks:
> >> > > + items:
> >> > > + - description: Main Oscillator (24 MHz)
> >> > > + - description: GMAC1 RMII reference
> >> > > + - description: GMAC1 RGMII RX
> >> > > + - description: External I2S TX bit clock
> >> > > + - description: External I2S TX left/right channel clock
> >> > > + - description: External I2S RX bit clock
> >> > > + - description: External I2S RX left/right channel clock
> >> > > + - description: External TDM clock
> >> > > + - description: External audio master clock
> >> >
> >> > So, from peeking at the clock driver & the dt - it looks like a bunch of
> >> > these are not actually required?
> >>
> >> These clocks are used as root clocks or optional parent clocks in clock tree.
> >> Some of them are optional, but they are required if we want to describe the
> >> complete clock tree of JH7110 SoC.
> >
> > Perhaps I have a misunderstand of what required means. To me, required
> > means "you must provide this clock for the SoC to operate in all
> > configurations".
> > Optional therefore would be for things that are needed only for some
> > configurations and may be omitted if not required.
> >
> > From your comment below, boards with a JH7110 may choose not to populate
> > both external clock inputs to a mux. In that case, "dummy" clocks should
> > not have to be provided in the DT of such boards to satisfy this binding
> > which seems wrong to me..
>
> Please see the picture of these external clocks in clock tree.
>
> # mount -t debugfs none /mnt
> # cat /mnt/clk/clk_summary
> enable prepare protect duty hardware
> clock count count count rate accuracy phase cycle enable
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *mclk_ext* 0 0 0 12288000 0 0 50000 Y
> *tdm_ext* 0 0 0 49152000 0 0 50000 Y
> *i2srx_lrck_ext* 0 0 0 192000 0 0 50000 Y
> *i2srx_bclk_ext* 0 0 0 12288000 0 0 50000 Y
> *i2stx_lrck_ext* 0 0 0 192000 0 0 50000 Y
> *i2stx_bclk_ext* 0 0 0 12288000 0 0 50000 Y
> *gmac1_rgmii_rxin* 0 0 0 125000000 0 0 50000 Y
> gmac1_rx 0 0 0 125000000 0 0 50000 Y
> gmac1_rx_inv 0 0 0 125000000 0 180 50000 Y
> *gmac1_rmii_refin* 0 0 0 50000000 0 0 50000 Y
> gmac1_rmii_rtx 0 0 0 50000000 0 0 50000 Y
> gmac1_tx 0 0 0 50000000 0 0 50000 N
> gmac1_tx_inv 0 0 0 50000000 0 180 50000 Y
> *osc* 4 4 0 24000000 0 0 50000 Y
> apb_func 0 0 0 24000000 0 0 50000 Y
> ...
>
> The clock "gmac1_rgmii_rxin" and the clock "gmac1_rmii_refin" are
> actually used as the parent of other clocks.
> The "dummy" clocks
> you said are all internal clocks.
No, what I meant by "dummy" clocks is that if you make clocks "required"
in the binding that are not needed by the hardware for operation a
customer of yours might have to add "dummy" clocks to their devicetree
to pass dtbs_check.
> For the audio related clocks (mclk_ext/tdm_ext/i2srx_lrck_ext/
> i2srx_bclk_ext/i2stx_lrck_ext/i2stx_bclk_ext), they will be used
> as the parent clocks in audio related drivers. Note that some
> clocks need to select different clocks as parent according to
> requirement.
> So all these external clocks are required.
>
> >
> > It would seem to me that you need to set minItems < maxItems here to
> > account for that & you do in fact need clock-names.
> >
> >>
> >> > I'd have ploughed through this, but having read Krzysztof's comments on
> >> > the DTS I'm not sure that this binding is correct.
> >> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20221220011247.35560-1-hal.feng@starfivetech.com/T/#mdf67621a2344dce801aa8015d4963593a2c28bcc
> >> >
> >> > I *think* the DT is correct - the fixed clocks are all inputs from clock
> >> > sources on the board and as such they are empty in soc.dtsi and are
> >> > populated in board.dts?
> >>
> >> Yes, the fixed clocks are all clock sources on the board and input to the SoC.
> >>
> >> >
> >> > However, are they all actually required? In the driver I see:
> >> > JH71X0__MUX(JH7110_SYSCLK_GMAC1_RX, "gmac1_rx", 2,
> >> > JH7110_SYSCLK_GMAC1_RGMII_RXIN,
> >> > JH7110_SYSCLK_GMAC1_RMII_RTX),
> >> > That macro is:
> >> > #define JH71X0__MUX(_idx, _name, _nparents, ...) [_idx] = { \
> >> > .name = _name, \
> >> > .flags = 0, \
> >> > .max = ((_nparents) - 1) << JH71X0_CLK_MUX_SHIFT, \
> >> > .parents = { __VA_ARGS__ }, \
> >> > }
> >> > AFAICT, RMII reference feeds RMII_RTX & RGMII RX *is* RGMII_RXIN?
> >> > Does that mean you need to populate only one of GMAC1 RMII reference
> >> > and GMAC1 RMGII RX and the other is optional?
> >> Yes, actually only one of them is chosen as the root clock
> >> source of the clock "gmac1_rx".
| *gmac1_rgmii_rxin*
| gmac1_rx
| gmac1_rx_inv
| *gmac1_rmii_refin*
| gmac1_rmii_rtx
| gmac1_tx
| gmac1_tx_inv
|
| description: GMAC1 RMII reference
| description: GMAC1 RGMII RX
So you're telling me that you can either:
- Provide GMAC1 RMII reference and GMAC1 RGMII RX & then use different
clocks for gmac1_rx and gmac1_tx
- Provide only GMAC1 RMII reference & use it for both gmac1_tx *and*
gmac1_rx
Is that correct?
> >> >
> >> > > +
> >> > > + clock-names:
> >> > > + items:
> >> > > + - const: osc
> >> > > + - const: gmac1_rmii_refin
> >> > > + - const: gmac1_rgmii_rxin
> >> > > + - const: i2stx_bclk_ext
> >> > > + - const: i2stx_lrck_ext
> >> > > + - const: i2srx_bclk_ext
> >> > > + - const: i2srx_lrck_ext
> >> > > + - const: tdm_ext
> >> > > + - const: mclk_ext
> >> >
> >> > If all clocks are in fact required though, isn't this kinda pointless to
> >> > have since we already know that the order is fixed from the "clocks"
> >> > property?
> >> > Krzk/Rob?
> >>
> >> The clock-names are used to easily identify these clocks in the clock driver.
> >
> > *IF* all clocks were in fact required, which they aren't, you could rely
> > on the order alone in the driver as it is enforced by the binding.
>
> OK, I'll remove "clock-names" property in the bindings and device tree.
> Instead, will use index to get these clocks in drivers.
Hang on until you answer my question above before deleting this from the
dt-binding & driver ;)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20230216/0230919d/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list