[PATCH v1 RFC Zisslpcfi 13/20] riscv: illegal instruction handler for cfi violations
Deepak Gupta
debug at rivosinc.com
Sun Feb 12 20:53:42 PST 2023
Zisslpcfi spec proposes that cfi violations are reported as illegal
instruction exception. Following are the cases
- elp missing: An indirect jmp/call landed on instruction which is
not `lpcll`
- label mismatch: Static label embedded in instr `lpcll/lpcml/lpcul`
doesn't match with repsective label in CSR_LPLR
- sscheckra: x1 and x5 don't match.
Current changes run user code in audit mode. That means that any cfi
violation is suppressed and app is allowed to continue.
Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta <debug at rivosinc.com>
---
arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
index 5553b8d48ba5..a292699f4f25 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
@@ -97,6 +97,10 @@ static void do_trap_error(struct pt_regs *regs, int signo, int code,
/* Zisslpcfi instructions encodings */
#define SS_PUSH_POP 0x81C04073
#define SS_AMOSWAP 0x82004073
+#define SS_CHECKRA 0x8A12C073
+#define LP_C_LL 0x83004073
+#define LP_C_ML 0x86804073
+#define LP_C_UL 0x8B804073
bool is_ss_load_store_insn(unsigned long insn)
{
@@ -112,6 +116,71 @@ bool is_ss_load_store_insn(unsigned long insn)
return false;
}
+bool is_cfi_violation_insn(unsigned long insn)
+{
+ struct task_struct *task = current;
+ bool ss_exist = false, lp_exist = false;
+
+ ss_exist = arch_supports_shadow_stack();
+ lp_exist = arch_supports_indirect_br_lp_instr();
+
+ if (ss_exist && (insn == SS_CHECKRA)) {
+ pr_warn("cfi violation (sschkra): comm = %s, task = %p\n", task->comm, task);
+ return true;
+ }
+ if (lp_exist && ((insn & LP_C_LL) == LP_C_LL)) {
+ pr_warn("cfi violation (lpcll): comm = %s, task = %p\n", task->comm, task);
+ return true;
+ }
+ if (lp_exist && ((insn & LP_C_ML) == LP_C_ML)) {
+ pr_warn("cfi violation (lpcml): comm = %s, task = %p\n", task->comm, task);
+ return true;
+ }
+ if (lp_exist && ((insn & LP_C_UL) == LP_C_UL)) {
+ pr_warn("cfi violation (lpcul): comm = %s, task = %p\n", task->comm, task);
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+int handle_illegal_instruction(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ /* stval should hold faulting opcode */
+ unsigned long insn = csr_read(stval);
+ struct thread_info *info = NULL;
+ struct task_struct *task = current;
+
+ info = current_thread_info();
+ /*
+ * If CFI enabled then following instructions leads to illegal instruction fault
+ * -- sscheckra: x1 and x5 mismatch
+ * -- ELP = 1, Any instruction other than lpcll will fault
+ * -- lpcll will fault if lower label don't match with LPLR.LL
+ * -- lpcml will fault if lower label don't match with LPLR.ML
+ * -- lpcul will fault if lower label don't match with LPLR.UL
+ */
+
+ /* If fcfi enabled and ELP = 1, suppress ELP (audit mode) and resume */
+ if (arch_supports_indirect_br_lp_instr() &&
+#ifdef CONFIG_USER_INDIRECT_BR_LP
+ info->user_cfi_state.ufcfi_en &&
+#endif
+ (regs->status & SR_ELP)) {
+ pr_warn("cfi violation (elp): comm = %s, task = %p\n", task->comm, task);
+ regs->status &= ~(SR_ELP);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ /* if faulting opcode is sscheckra/lpcll/lpcml/lpcll, advance PC and resume */
+ if (is_cfi_violation_insn(insn)) {
+ /* no compressed form for zisslpcfi instructions */
+ regs->epc += 4;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ return 1;
+}
+
ulong get_instruction(ulong epc)
{
ulong *epc_ptr = (ulong *) epc;
@@ -190,8 +259,14 @@ DO_ERROR_INFO(do_trap_insn_misaligned,
SIGBUS, BUS_ADRALN, "instruction address misaligned");
DO_ERROR_INFO(do_trap_insn_fault,
SIGSEGV, SEGV_ACCERR, "instruction access fault");
-DO_ERROR_INFO(do_trap_insn_illegal,
- SIGILL, ILL_ILLOPC, "illegal instruction");
+
+asmlinkage void __trap_section do_trap_insn_illegal(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ if (!handle_illegal_instruction(regs))
+ return;
+ do_trap_error(regs, SIGILL, ILL_ILLOPC, regs->epc,
+ "illegal instruction");
+}
#ifdef CONFIG_USER_SHADOW_STACK
asmlinkage void __trap_section do_trap_load_fault(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
--
2.25.1
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list