[PATCH] Documentation: riscv: fix insufficient list item indent

[Palmer Dabbelt]

On Sun, 29 Jan 2023 19:05:53 PST (-0800), bagasdotme at gmail.com wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 11:57:01PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
>> 
>> When adding the ISA string ordering rules, I didn't sufficiently indent
>> one of the list items.
>> 
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp at intel.com>
>> Fixes: f07b2b3f9d47 ("Documentation: riscv: add a section about ISA string ordering in /proc/cpuinfo")
>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
>
> Seems like you forget to add link to the report:
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/202301300743.bp7Dpazv-lkp@intel.com/

Is that the normal way to do it?  I've only been adding the Reported-by 
like the bot suggests, but I guess it's kind of nice information to have 
the bug report as well.  From looking at git history it's kind of a mix.

Maybe the bot should suggest this in the bug report, right next to the other
tag?

>> ---
>>  Documentation/riscv/uabi.rst | 8 ++++----
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/Documentation/riscv/uabi.rst b/Documentation/riscv/uabi.rst
>> index 2ebec4c52230..8960fac42c40 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/riscv/uabi.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/riscv/uabi.rst
>> @@ -21,10 +21,10 @@ so for our purposes the following rules apply:
>>     single-letter extensions and before any higher-privileged extensions.
>>  
>>  #. For additional standard extensions, the first letter following the 'Z'
>> -  conventionally indicates the most closely related alphabetical
>> -  extension category. If multiple 'Z' extensions are named, they will be ordered
>> -  first by category, in canonical order, as listed above, then alphabetically
>> -  within a category.
>> +   conventionally indicates the most closely related alphabetical
>> +   extension category. If multiple 'Z' extensions are named, they will be
>> +   ordered first by category, in canonical order, as listed above, then
>> +   alphabetically within a category.
>>  
>>  #. Standard supervisor-level extensions (starting with 'S') will be listed
>>     after standard unprivileged extensions.  If multiple supervisor-level
>
> The warning is fixed, thanks!
>
> Reviewed-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme at gmail.com>
>
> -- 
> An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara