[PATCH -next V3 1/2] riscv: jump_label: Fixup unaligned arch_static_branch function

[Björn Töpel]

Trimming Cc.

Guo Ren <guoren at kernel.org> writes:

>> @Guo I don't see the point of doing a series for this, and asking the
>> maintainers to "pick this patch to stable, and the other for
>> next". Isn't that just more work for the maintainers/reviewers?
> If these two patches are separated, they are all fixup that issue and
> competed with each other. Making my patch an optimization patch must
> depend on it. That's why I put them in one series.

They are not depedent at all, and not "fixup". The first is a fix, and
should go into -fixes ASAP. The other patch is completely stand-alone,
and an optimization (maybe). If that go in, it's for -next.

Having them as separate patches, makes it easier for
reviewers/maintainers. Now, with your approach there's more work
(cognitive, and manual) for others.


Björn