[PATCH v7 02/39] prctl: arch-agnostic prctl for shadow stack

[Mark Brown]

On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 11:43:49AM -0800, Deepak Gupta wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 5:37 AM Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 04:50:38PM -0800, Deepak Gupta wrote:

> > > How will it do that (currently _ENABLE is married to _WRITE and _PUSH) ?

> > That's feeling moderately firmly into "don't do that" territory to be
> > honest, the problems of trying to modify the stack of another running
> > thread while it's active just don't seem worth it - if you're
> > coordinating enough to do the modifications it's probably possible to
> > just ask the thread who's stack is being modified to do the modification
> > itself and having an unprotected thread writing into shadow stack memory
> > doesn't feel great.

> Yeah no leanings on my side. Just wanted to articulate this scenario.
> Since this is new ground,
> we can define what's appropriate. Let's keep it this way where a
> thread can write to shadow
> stack mappings only when it itself has shadow stack enabled.

Sounds good to me - it's much easier to relax permissions later than to
tighten them up.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20231213/2b5079b7/attachment.sig>