[PATCH v7 24/39] arm64/signal: Set up and restore the GCS context for signal handlers
Mark Brown
broonie at kernel.org
Sat Dec 9 05:09:45 PST 2023
On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 12:15:22AM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org> writes:
> > + /* The cap must have the low bits set to a token value */
> > + if (GCS_CAP_TOKEN(val) != 0)
> > + return false;
> I found the comment above a little confusing, since the if condition
> actually checks that low bits aren't set at all. Perhaps reword to
> something like "The token value of a signal cap must be 0"?
Right, that's bitrot from the previous token format.
> I'm still not proficient enough in GCS to know how exactly this could be
> abused (e.g., somehow writing the desired return location right above
> one of these inactive caps and arranging for GCSPR to point to the cap
> before returning from a signal) but to be safe or paranoid, perhaps zero
> the location of the cap before returning?
Right, ideally we'd be doing a compare and exchange here to substitute
in a zero.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20231209/5054f50f/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list