[v3 5/6] drm/vs: Add hdmi driver

[Maxime Ripard]

Hi,

On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 11:23:37AM +0800, Andy Yan wrote:
> 在 2023-12-08 11:00:31，"Keith Zhao" <keith.zhao at starfivetech.com> 写道：
> >
> >
> >On 2023/12/8 8:37, Andy Yan wrote:
> >> Hi Keth：
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 在 2023-12-07 18:48:13，"Keith Zhao" <keith.zhao at starfivetech.com> 写道：
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>On 2023/12/7 17:02, Andy Yan wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> Hi Keith：
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> At 2023-12-06 22:11:33, "Keith Zhao" <keith.zhao at starfivetech.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>On 2023/12/6 20:56, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 08:02:55PM +0800, Keith Zhao wrote:
> >>>>>>> >> +static const struct of_device_id starfive_hdmi_dt_ids[] = {
> >>>>>>> >> +	{ .compatible = "starfive,jh7110-inno-hdmi",},
> >>>>>>> > 
> >>>>>>> > So it's inno hdmi, just like Rockchip then?
> >>>>>>> > 
> >>>>>>> > This should be a common driver.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Rockchip has a inno hdmi IP. and Starfive has a inno hdmi IP.
> >>>>>>> but the harewawre difference of them is big , it is not easy to use the common driver
> >>>>>>> maybe i need the inno hdmi version here to make a distinction
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> I just had a look at the rockchip header file: all the registers but the
> >>>>>> STARFIVE_* ones are identical.
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> There's no need to have two identical drivers then, please use the
> >>>>>> rockchip driver instead.
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Maxime
> >>>>>
> >>>>>ok, have a simple test , edid can get . i will continue 
> >>>> 
> >>>> Maybe you can take drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi as a reference， this
> >>>> is also a hdmi ip used by rockchip/meson/sunxi/jz/imx。
> >>>> We finally make it share one driver。
> >>>>>
> >>>hi Andy:
> >>>
> >>>dw_hdmi seems a good choice , it can handle inno hdmi hardware by define its dw_hdmi_plat_data.
> >>>does it means i can write own driver files such as(dw_hdmi-starfive.c) based on dw_hdmi instead of add plat_data in inno_hdmi.c
> >>>
> >> 
> >> I think the process maybe like this：
> >> 
> >> 1. split the inno_hdmi.c under rockchip to  inno_hdmi.c(the common part), inno_hdmi-rockchip.c(the soc specific part)
> >> 2. move the common part inno_hdmi.c to drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/innosilicon/
> >> 3. add startfive specific part, inno_hdmi-startfive.c
> >> 
> >> bellow git log from kernel three show how we convert  dw_hdmi to a common driver: 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 12b9f204e804 drm: bridge/dw_hdmi: add rockchip rk3288 support
> >> 74af9e4d03b8 dt-bindings: Add documentation for rockchip dw hdmi
> >> d346c14eeea9 drm: bridge/dw_hdmi: add function dw_hdmi_phy_enable_spare
> >> a4d3b8b050d5 drm: bridge/dw_hdmi: clear i2cmphy_stat0 reg in hdmi_phy_wait_i2c_done
> >> 632d035bace2 drm: bridge/dw_hdmi: add mode_valid support
> >> 0cd9d1428322 drm: bridge/dw_hdmi: add support for multi-byte register width access
> >> cd152393967e dt-bindings: add document for dw_hdmi
> >> b21f4b658df8 drm: imx: imx-hdmi: move imx-hdmi to bridge/dw_hdmi
> >> aaa757a092c2 drm: imx: imx-hdmi: split phy configuration to platform driver
> >> 3d1b35a3d9f3 drm: imx: imx-hdmi: convert imx-hdmi to drm_bridge mode
> >> c2c3848851a7 drm: imx: imx-hdmi: return defer if can't get ddc i2c adapter
> >> b587833933de drm: imx: imx-hdmi: make checkpatch happy
> >> 
> >hi Andy:
> >I got you means, 
> >as I don't have a rockchip board on hand , to split the inno_hdmi.c can not be tested.
> >
> >how adout this idea:
> >1、split the starfive_hdmi.c under verisilicion to  inno_hdmi.c(the common part), inno_hdmi-starfive.c(the soc specific part)
> >2. move the common part inno_hdmi.c to drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/innosilicon/
> >3. In the future, inno hdmi.c under rockchip will reuse the public driver.
> 
> I am not sure if drm maintainers are happy with this。

Not really, no.

Because we would still have two drivers for the same controller, and a
common one that haven't really been tested on anything but a single
platform. So arguably a worse situation than what you were suggesting in
the first place.

The best solution would be to find someone with a Rockchip board to test
your changes, or to get one if it's doable so you can test yourself.

Maxime
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20231208/7357c872/attachment.sig>