[PATCH -next v9 0/2] support allocating crashkernel above 4G explicitly on riscv
chenjiahao (C)
chenjiahao16 at huawei.com
Tue Aug 29 02:54:35 PDT 2023
Hi folks,
This is a friendly ping. Anyone has additional comments on this patch set?
Best regards,
Jiahao
On 2023/7/27 1:49, Chen Jiahao wrote:
> On riscv, the current crash kernel allocation logic is trying to
> allocate within 32bit addressible memory region by default, if
> failed, try to allocate without 4G restriction.
>
> In need of saving DMA zone memory while allocating a relatively large
> crash kernel region, allocating the reserved memory top down in
> high memory, without overlapping the DMA zone, is a mature solution.
> Hence this patchset introduces the parameter option crashkernel=X,[high,low].
>
> One can reserve the crash kernel from high memory above DMA zone range
> by explicitly passing "crashkernel=X,high"; or reserve a memory range
> below 4G with "crashkernel=X,low". Besides, there are few rules need
> to take notice:
> 1. "crashkernel=X,[high,low]" will be ignored if "crashkernel=size"
> is specified.
> 2. "crashkernel=X,low" is valid only when "crashkernel=X,high" is passed
> and there is enough memory to be allocated under 4G.
> 3. When allocating crashkernel above 4G and no "crashkernel=X,low" is
> specified, a 128M low memory will be allocated automatically for
> swiotlb bounce buffer.
> See Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt for more information.
>
> To verify loading the crashkernel, adapted kexec-tools is attached below:
> https://github.com/chenjh005/kexec-tools/tree/build-test-riscv-v2
>
> Following test cases have been performed as expected:
> 1) crashkernel=256M //low=256M
> 2) crashkernel=1G //low=1G
> 3) crashkernel=4G //high=4G, low=128M(default)
> 4) crashkernel=4G crashkernel=256M,high //high=4G, low=128M(default), high is ignored
> 5) crashkernel=4G crashkernel=256M,low //high=4G, low=128M(default), low is ignored
> 6) crashkernel=4G,high //high=4G, low=128M(default)
> 7) crashkernel=256M,low //low=0M, invalid
> 8) crashkernel=4G,high crashkernel=256M,low //high=4G, low=256M
> 9) crashkernel=4G,high crashkernel=4G,low //high=0M, low=0M, invalid
> 10) crashkernel=512M at 0xd0000000 //low=512M
> 11) crashkernel=1G,high crashkernel=0M,low //high=1G, low=0M
>
> Changes since [v9]:
> 1. As per Conor's comment, rebase to correct base on riscv/for-next
> branch. No code logic changed.
>
> Changes since [v8]:
> 1. Rebase to newest mainline head, not modifying any code logic.
>
> Changes since [v7]:
> 1. Minor refactor: move crash_low_size = DEFAULT_CRASH_KERNEL_LOW_SIZE
> into the !high branch when the first allocation fails. Not changing
> the result but further align with Arm64 logic, refer to Baoquan's
> comment.
> 2. Add test case "crashkernel=1G,high crashkernel=0M,low", the result
> also matches our expectation.
>
> Changes since [v6]:
> 1. Introduce the "high" flag to mark whether "crashkernel=X,high"
> is passed. Fix the retrying logic between "crashkernel=X,high"
> case and others when the first allocation attempt fails.
>
> Changes since [v5]:
> 1. Update the crashkernel allocation logic when crashkernel=X,high
> is specified. In this case, region above 4G will directly get
> reserved as crashkernel, rather than trying lower 32bit allocation
> first.
>
> Changes since [v4]:
> 1. Update some imprecise code comments for cmdline parsing.
>
> Changes since [v3]:
> 1. Update to print warning and return explicitly on failure when
> crashkernel=size at offset is specified. Not changing the result
> in this case but making the logic more straightforward.
> 2. Some minor cleanup.
>
> Changes since [v2]:
> 1. Update the allocation logic to ensure the high crashkernel
> region is reserved strictly above dma32_phys_limit.
> 2. Clean up some minor format problems.
>
> Chen Jiahao (2):
> riscv: kdump: Implement crashkernel=X,[high,low]
> docs: kdump: Update the crashkernel description for riscv
>
> .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 15 +--
> arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 5 +
> arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list