[PATCH v7 02/15] of: property: Add fw_devlink support for msi-parent

[Saravana Kannan]

On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 12:39 PM Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 08:30:05PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> > This allows fw_devlink to create device links between consumers of
> > a MSI and the supplier of the MSI.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel at ventanamicro.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/of/property.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
> > index ddc75cd50825..bc20535deed7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/of/property.c
> > +++ b/drivers/of/property.c
> > @@ -1325,6 +1325,37 @@ static struct device_node *parse_interrupts(struct device_node *np,
> >       return of_irq_parse_one(np, index, &sup_args) ? NULL : sup_args.np;
> >  }
> >
> > +static struct device_node *parse_msi_parent(struct device_node *np,
> > +                                         const char *prop_name, int index)
> > +{
> > +     struct of_phandle_args sup_args;
> > +     struct device_node *msi_np;
> > +
> > +     if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPARC))
> > +             return NULL;
> > +
> > +     if (strcmp(prop_name, "msi-parent"))
> > +             return NULL;
> > +
> > +     msi_np = of_parse_phandle(np, prop_name, 0);
> > +     if (msi_np) {
> > +             if (!of_property_read_bool(msi_np, "#msi-cells")) {
>
> Use of_property_present() to check presence.
>
> However, this check is wrong. #msi-cells is optional and assumed to be 0
> if not present. There's another flavor of of_parse_phandle_with_args()
> that allows specifying a default cell count, so I think you can get rid
> of all this checking.

Rob,

The existing DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP() already does this btw. See commit
ff24fed10ba41. Anup just ignores review comments.

Anup,

Saw your reply here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAK9=C2W+3pOWL36ZPme1LpHz5PEBVdKWv+kR7DYKmRyw1AymMA@mail.gmail.com/

Did you even try the macro? Why are you so hell bent on wasting our
time by ignoring code review comments and sending the same useless
patch?

-Saravana

>
> > +                     if (index) {
> > +                             of_node_put(msi_np);
> > +                             return NULL;
> > +                     }
> > +                     return msi_np;
> > +             }
> > +             of_node_put(msi_np);
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     if (of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, prop_name, "#msi-cells", index,
> > +                                    &sup_args))
> > +             return NULL;
> > +
> > +     return sup_args.np;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static const struct supplier_bindings of_supplier_bindings[] = {
> >       { .parse_prop = parse_clocks, },
> >       { .parse_prop = parse_interconnects, },
> > @@ -1359,6 +1390,7 @@ static const struct supplier_bindings of_supplier_bindings[] = {
> >       { .parse_prop = parse_regulators, },
> >       { .parse_prop = parse_gpio, },
> >       { .parse_prop = parse_gpios, },
> > +     { .parse_prop = parse_msi_parent, },
> >       {}
> >  };
> >
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >