[PATCH v3 21/36] arm64/mm: Implement map_shadow_stack()
Mark Brown
broonie at kernel.org
Mon Aug 7 06:00:42 PDT 2023
On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 11:20:58AM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> The 07/31/2023 14:43, Mark Brown wrote:
> > +SYSCALL_DEFINE3(map_shadow_stack, unsigned long, addr, unsigned long, size, unsigned int, flags)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long alloc_size;
> > + unsigned long __user *cap_ptr;
> > + unsigned long cap_val;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (!system_supports_gcs())
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +
> > + if (flags)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (addr % 16)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> mmap addr must be page aligned (and there is no align req on size).
> i'd expect similar api here.
That's not what the manual page or a quick check of the code suggest
that mmap() does, they say that the kernel just takes it as a hint and
chooses a nearby page boundary, though I didn't test. I'm not sure why
I have that alignment check at all TBH, and to the extent it's needed I
could just be 8 - this level of code doesn't really care.
> > + if (size == 16 || size % 16)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> why %16 and not %8 ?
I don't think that's needed any more - there was some stuff in an
earlier version of the code but no longer.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20230807/938c3d4b/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list