[PATCH v7 01/12] KVM: Rename kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlb() to kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs()

Raghavendra Rao Ananta rananta at google.com
Wed Aug 2 16:30:39 PDT 2023


Okay, so just the #define in the respective arch header with a global
declaration. I'll consider this in v8.

Thanks,
Raghavendra

On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 9:10 AM Sean Christopherson <seanjc at google.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2023, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Tue, 01 Aug 2023 01:42:54 +0100,
> > Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta at google.com> wrote:
> > > Thanks for the suggestions; I can go with a common declaration. Along
> > > with that, do we want to keep defining
> > > __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_FLUSH_REMOTE_TLBS in the arch code that supports it or
> > > convert it into a CONFIG_?
> >
> > This isn't something that a user can select, more something that is an
> > architectural decision. Maybe in a later patch if there is a consensus
> > around that, but probably not as part of this series.
>
> +1.  I agree it's annoying that KVM uses a mix of Kconfigs and manual #defines
> for the various "KVM_HAVE" knobs, but we have so many of both that one-off
> conversions without a real need don't make much sense.



More information about the linux-riscv mailing list