[PATCH v1] riscv: Using TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZIHINTPAUSE marco replace zihintpause

Greg KH gregkh at linuxfoundation.org
Wed Aug 2 01:33:27 PDT 2023


On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 04:17:51PM +0800, Minda Chen wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2023/8/2 15:48, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 03:32:15PM +0800, Minda Chen wrote:
> >> 
> >> 
> >> On 2023/8/2 14:54, Conor Dooley wrote:
> >> > Hey Minda,
> >> > 
> >> > On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 02:42:15PM +0800, Minda Chen wrote:
> >> >> Actually it is a part of Conor's
> >> >> commit aae538cd03bc ("riscv: fix detection of toolchain
> >> >> Zihintpause support").
> >> >> It is looks like a merge issue.
> >> > 
> >> > Yup, spot on.
> >> > 
> >> >> Samuel's
> >> >> commit 0b1d60d6dd9e ("riscv: Fix build with
> >> >> CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y") do not base on Conor's commit and
> >> >> revert to __riscv_zihintpause. So this patch can fix it.
> >> >> 
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Minda Chen <minda.chen at starfivetech.com>
> >> > 
> >> > Did you actually manage to trigger this, or was this by inspection?
> >> > clang-15 + binutils 2.35 was, IIRC, how we spotted this because that's
> >> > what the clang-built-linux CI uses to test the LTS kernels from before
> >> > LLVM's IAS was supported for RISC-V. Seemingly all that needs to be
> >> > satisfied there is that zihintpause doesn't appear in -march so this has
> >> > gone unnoticed.
> >> > 
> >> > Fixes: 3c349eacc559 ("Merge patch "riscv: Fix build with CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y"")
> >> > Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
> >> > 
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Conor.
> >> > 
> >> Thanks, Conor. I found this just by inspection. I found a issue that vdso.so call cpu_relax
> >> cause application core dump in kernel 6.1.31. I need Samuel'patch to fix this. And I search the log
> >> of processor.h found this issue.
> > 
> > That doesn't look like it is fixed in later stable kernels (we are at
> > 6.1.42-rcN right now I think). It sounds we should ask Greg to backport
> > 0b1d60d6dd9e ("riscv: Fix build with CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y")
> > to 6.1. Does that make sense to you?
> Yes. 6.1 is lts kernel. Starfive will use this kernel for a long time. Thanks.

What is preventing you from moving to a newer kernel version?  All of
your kernel changes are already properly merged into Linus's tree,
right?

thanks,

greg k-h



More information about the linux-riscv mailing list