[PATCH v1 1/7] dt-bindings: power: Constrain properties for JH7110 PMU

[Conor Dooley]

On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 10:20:31AM +0800, Changhuang Liang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2023/4/12 19:29, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 12/04/2023 11:42, Conor Dooley wrote:
> >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 04:51:16PM +0800, Changhuang Liang wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 2023/4/12 16:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>>> On 11/04/2023 08:47, Changhuang Liang wrote:
> >>>>> When use "starfive,jh7110-pmu-dphy" compatible, do not need the reg and
> >>>>> interrupts properties.
> >>> [...]
> >>>>>  
> >>>>>  description: |
> >>>>>    StarFive JH7110 SoC includes support for multiple power domains which can be
> >>>>> @@ -17,6 +18,7 @@ properties:
> >>>>>    compatible:
> >>>>>      enum:
> >>>>>        - starfive,jh7110-pmu
> >>>>> +      - starfive,jh7110-pmu-dphy
> >>>>
> >>>> You do here much more than commit msg says.
> >>>>
> >>>> Isn'y DPHY a phy? Why is it in power?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> OK, I will add more description. This is a power framework used to turn on/off 
> >>> DPHY. So it in power, not a phy.
> 
> I found something wrong with my description here, not turn on/off DPHY,
> is turn on/off DPHY power switch. 
> 
> >>
> >> Perhaps tie it less to its role w/ the phy, and more to do with its
> >> location, say "jh7110-aon-pmu"?
> >> There's already "aon"/"sys"/"stg" stuff used in clock-controller and
> >> syscon compatibles etc.
> >>
> >> Krzysztof, what do you think of that? (if you remember the whole
> >> discussion we previously had about using those identifiers a few weeks
> >> ago).
> > 
> > Depends whether this is the same case or not. AFAIR, for AON/SYS/STG
> > these were blocks with few features, not only clock controller.
> > 
> > This sounds like just phy. Powering on/off phy is still a job of phy
> > controller... unless it is a power domain controller.
> > Best regards,
> > Krzysztof
> > 
> 
> So, next version the compatible can be changed to "jh7110-aon-pmu"?

Hmm, is the dphy the only thing that's power is controlled by registers
in the aon syscon? I tried looking in the "preliminary" TRM that I have,
but it's not really got a proper register map so I could not tell.

If there are, it'd help your case I think Changhuang Liang.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20230417/b55a8e7d/attachment.sig>