[PATCH v3 5/7] dt-bindings: soc: starfive: Add StarFive syscon module

Xingyu Wu xingyu.wu at starfivetech.com
Mon Apr 17 00:43:48 PDT 2023


On 2023/4/14 20:37, Rob Herring wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 10:41:55 +0800, Xingyu Wu wrote:
>> From: William Qiu <william.qiu at starfivetech.com>
>> 
>> Add documentation to describe StarFive System Controller Registers.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: William Qiu <william.qiu at starfivetech.com>
>> ---
>>  .../soc/starfive/starfive,jh7110-syscon.yaml  | 58 +++++++++++++++++++
>>  MAINTAINERS                                   |  6 ++
>>  2 files changed, 64 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/starfive/starfive,jh7110-syscon.yaml
>> 
> 
> My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
> 
> yamllint warnings/errors:
> 
> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/starfive/starfive,jh7110-syscon.yaml: Unable to find schema file matching $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/starfive,jh7110-pll.yaml
> 
> doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
> 
> See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20230414024157.53203-6-xingyu.wu@starfivetech.com
> 
> The base for the series is generally the latest rc1. A different dependency
> should be noted in *this* patch.
> 
> If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
> error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
> date:
> 
> pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
> 
> Please check and re-submit after running the above command yourself. Note
> that DT_SCHEMA_FILES can be set to your schema file to speed up checking
> your schema. However, it must be unset to test all examples with your schema.
> 

I have updated yamllint and dtschema, and tested it and didn't see this error.
I asked william and also didn't see this. This error says the file:
http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/starfive,jh7110-pll.yaml was not found.
This file is added in patch 1 but patch 1 should be applied after these patchset
about JH7110 basic clock drivers. I don't know if that's the reason.

Best regards,
Xingyu Wu



More information about the linux-riscv mailing list