[PATCH v1 1/3] dt-binding: pci: add JH7110 PCIe dt-binding documents.

Krzysztof Kozlowski krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org
Thu Apr 6 11:52:19 PDT 2023


On 06/04/2023 20:45, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 07:35:09PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 08:24:55PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 06/04/2023 13:11, Minda Chen wrote:
>>>> +
>>>> +  interrupt-controller:
>>>> +    type: object
>>>> +    properties:
>>>> +      '#address-cells':
>>>> +        const: 0
>>>> +
>>>> +      '#interrupt-cells':
>>>> +        const: 1
>>>> +
>>>> +      interrupt-controller: true
>>>> +
>>>> +    required:
>>>> +      - '#address-cells'
>>>> +      - '#interrupt-cells'
>>>> +      - interrupt-controller
>>>> +
>>>> +    additionalProperties: false
>>>> +
>>>> +required:
>>>> +  - reg
>>>> +  - reg-names
>>>> +  - "#interrupt-cells"
>>>
>>> Keep consistent quotes - either ' or "
>>>
>>> Are you sure this is correct? You have interrupt controller as child node.
>>
>> I know existing stuff in-tree is far from a guarantee that it'll be
>> right, but this does at least follow what we've got for PolarFire SoC:
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/microchip,pcie-host.yaml
>>
>> Both PLDA and both RISC-V w/ a PLIC as the interrupt controller, so in
>> similar waters.
>> This note existed in the original text form binding of the Microchip
>> PCI controller:
>> | +NOTE:
>> | +The core provides a single interrupt for both INTx/MSI messages. So,
>> | +create an interrupt controller node to support 'interrupt-map' DT
>> | +functionality.  The driver will create an IRQ domain for this map, decode
>> | +the four INTx interrupts in ISR and route them to this domain.
>>
>> Given the similarities, I figure the same requirement applies here too.
>> Minda?
> 
> Further, if, as I currently suspect, there's a lot of commonality here,
> should the binding as well as the driver be split into common pdla bits
> and microchip/starfive specific ones?
> 
> Suppose that's more one for you Krzysztof.

Yeah, looks like only clocks and resets are different. At the end it
depends how much code you would remove...

Best regards,
Krzysztof




More information about the linux-riscv mailing list