[PATCH] kprobes: Mark ftrace mcount handler functions nokprobe
Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
mhiramat at kernel.org
Tue Sep 27 08:22:21 PDT 2022
On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 14:37:23 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt at goodmis.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2022 16:45:33 +0800
> Liao Chang <liaochang1 at huawei.com> wrote:
>
> > Mark ftrace mcount handler functions nokprobe since probing on these
> > functions probably reaches mcount recursivly during kprobe breakpoint
> > handler for some architecture(tested for riscv, arm64), and reenter
> > kprobe is treated as a fatal error, causes kernel panic.
>
> This looks to me that the affected archs should be made more robust for this
> case than to add this to the generic code.
Yeah, kprobes (arch specific code) itself shouldn't be traced by ftrace usually.
Thank you,
>
> -- Steve
>
>
> >
> > Pesudo code below demonstrate this problem:
> >
> > mcount
> > function_trace_call (probed)
> > arch_breakpoint_handler
> > arch_setup_singlestep [mcount]
> > function_trace_call (probed)
> > arch_breakpoint_handler
> > reenter_kprobe
> > BUG
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Liao Chang <liaochang1 at huawei.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/trace/trace_functions.c | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_functions.c b/kernel/trace/trace_functions.c
> > index 9f1bfbe105e8..440a678a8c7c 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_functions.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_functions.c
> > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> > #include <linux/ftrace.h>
> > #include <linux/slab.h>
> > #include <linux/fs.h>
> > +#include <linux/kprobes.h>
> >
> > #include "trace.h"
> >
> > @@ -194,6 +195,7 @@ function_trace_call(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
> >
> > ftrace_test_recursion_unlock(bit);
> > }
> > +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(function_trace_call);
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC
> > /*
> > @@ -245,6 +247,7 @@ function_stack_trace_call(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
> > atomic_dec(&data->disabled);
> > local_irq_restore(flags);
> > }
> > +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(function_stack_trace_call);
> >
> > static inline bool is_repeat_check(struct trace_array *tr,
> > struct trace_func_repeats *last_info,
> > @@ -321,6 +324,7 @@ function_no_repeats_trace_call(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
> > out:
> > ftrace_test_recursion_unlock(bit);
> > }
> > +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(function_no_repeats_trace_call);
> >
> > static void
> > function_stack_no_repeats_trace_call(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
> > @@ -363,6 +367,7 @@ function_stack_no_repeats_trace_call(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
> > atomic_dec(&data->disabled);
> > local_irq_restore(flags);
> > }
> > +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(function_stack_no_repeats_trace_call);
> >
> > static struct tracer_opt func_opts[] = {
> > #ifdef CONFIG_STACKTRACE
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat at kernel.org>
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list