[PATCH RFC v2 riscv/for-next 5/5] riscv: align arch_static_branch function
Guo Ren
guoren at kernel.org
Wed Sep 14 18:47:11 PDT 2022
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 10:24 PM Jessica Clarke <jrtc27 at jrtc27.com> wrote:
>
> On 13 Sept 2022, at 10:42, Andy Chiu <andy.chiu at sifive.com> wrote:
> >
> > runtime code patching must be done at a naturally aligned address, or we
> > may execute on a partial instruction.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Chiu <andy.chiu at sifive.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Greentime Hu <greentime.hu at sifive.com>
> > ---
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h
> > index 38af2ec7b9bf..729991e8f782 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h
> > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ static __always_inline bool arch_static_branch(struct static_key *key,
> > bool branch)
> > {
> > asm_volatile_goto(
> > + " .align 2 \n\t"
>
> .align is a horrible directive whose meaning changes between
> architectures and requires careful thought, especially when the
> argument is a power of 2. Better to use .balign 4, or .p2align 2 if you
> really want to for some reason.
Do we really need to align here? Should it be naturally done by the compiler?
>
> Jess
>
> > " .option push \n\t"
> > " .option norelax \n\t"
> > " .option norvc \n\t"
> > @@ -39,6 +40,7 @@ static __always_inline bool arch_static_branch_jump(struct static_key *key,
> > bool branch)
> > {
> > asm_volatile_goto(
> > + " .align 2 \n\t"
> > " .option push \n\t"
> > " .option norelax \n\t"
> > " .option norvc \n\t"
> > --
> > 2.36.0
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-riscv mailing list
> > linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
>
--
Best Regards
Guo Ren
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list