[PATCH v4 10/13] clk: microchip: mpfs: delete 2 line mpfs_clk_register_foo()
Claudiu.Beznea at microchip.com
Claudiu.Beznea at microchip.com
Wed Sep 7 23:47:04 PDT 2022
On 30.08.2022 15:52, Conor Dooley wrote:
> The register functions are now comprised of only a single operation
> each and no longer add anything to the driver. Delete them.
>
> Reviewed-by: Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara at microchip.com>
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea at microchip.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs.c | 33 ++++++--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs.c b/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs.c
> index 60e1e82912fe..538cb589d232 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs.c
> @@ -203,14 +203,6 @@ static struct mpfs_msspll_hw_clock mpfs_msspll_clks[] = {
> MSSPLL_FBDIV_WIDTH, 0, REG_MSSPLL_SSCG_2_CR),
> };
>
> -static int mpfs_clk_register_msspll(struct device *dev, struct mpfs_msspll_hw_clock *msspll_hw,
> - void __iomem *base)
> -{
> - msspll_hw->base = base;
> -
> - return devm_clk_hw_register(dev, &msspll_hw->hw);
> -}
> -
> static int mpfs_clk_register_mssplls(struct device *dev, struct mpfs_msspll_hw_clock *msspll_hws,
> unsigned int num_clks, struct mpfs_clock_data *data)
> {
> @@ -220,7 +212,8 @@ static int mpfs_clk_register_mssplls(struct device *dev, struct mpfs_msspll_hw_c
> for (i = 0; i < num_clks; i++) {
> struct mpfs_msspll_hw_clock *msspll_hw = &msspll_hws[i];
>
> - ret = mpfs_clk_register_msspll(dev, msspll_hw, data->msspll_base);
> + msspll_hw->base = data->msspll_base;
> + ret = devm_clk_hw_register(dev, &msspll_hw->hw);
> if (ret)
> return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to register msspll id: %d\n",
> CLK_MSSPLL);
> @@ -314,14 +307,6 @@ static struct mpfs_cfg_hw_clock mpfs_cfg_clks[] = {
> }
> };
>
> -static int mpfs_clk_register_cfg(struct device *dev, struct mpfs_cfg_hw_clock *cfg_hw,
> - void __iomem *base)
> -{
> - cfg_hw->cfg.reg = base + cfg_hw->reg_offset;
> -
> - return devm_clk_hw_register(dev, &cfg_hw->hw);
> -}
> -
> static int mpfs_clk_register_cfgs(struct device *dev, struct mpfs_cfg_hw_clock *cfg_hws,
> unsigned int num_clks, struct mpfs_clock_data *data)
> {
> @@ -331,7 +316,8 @@ static int mpfs_clk_register_cfgs(struct device *dev, struct mpfs_cfg_hw_clock *
> for (i = 0; i < num_clks; i++) {
> struct mpfs_cfg_hw_clock *cfg_hw = &cfg_hws[i];
>
> - ret = mpfs_clk_register_cfg(dev, cfg_hw, data->base);
> + cfg_hw->cfg.reg = data->base + cfg_hw->reg_offset;
> + ret = devm_clk_hw_register(dev, &cfg_hw->hw);
> if (ret)
> return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to register clock id: %d\n",
> cfg_hw->id);
> @@ -454,14 +440,6 @@ static struct mpfs_periph_hw_clock mpfs_periph_clks[] = {
> CLK_PERIPH(CLK_CFM, "clk_periph_cfm", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 29, 0),
> };
>
> -static int mpfs_clk_register_periph(struct device *dev, struct mpfs_periph_hw_clock *periph_hw,
> - void __iomem *base)
> -{
> - periph_hw->periph.reg = base + REG_SUBBLK_CLOCK_CR;
> -
> - return devm_clk_hw_register(dev, &periph_hw->hw);
> -}
> -
> static int mpfs_clk_register_periphs(struct device *dev, struct mpfs_periph_hw_clock *periph_hws,
> int num_clks, struct mpfs_clock_data *data)
> {
> @@ -471,7 +449,8 @@ static int mpfs_clk_register_periphs(struct device *dev, struct mpfs_periph_hw_c
> for (i = 0; i < num_clks; i++) {
> struct mpfs_periph_hw_clock *periph_hw = &periph_hws[i];
>
> - ret = mpfs_clk_register_periph(dev, periph_hw, data->base);
> + periph_hw->periph.reg = data->base + REG_SUBBLK_CLOCK_CR;
> + ret = devm_clk_hw_register(dev, &periph_hw->hw);
> if (ret)
> return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to register clock id: %d\n",
> periph_hw->id);
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list