[PATCH 1/3] RISC-V: Output cbom-block-size
Andrew Jones
ajones at ventanamicro.com
Tue Sep 6 02:29:34 PDT 2022
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 09:00:20AM +0000, Conor.Dooley at microchip.com wrote:
> On 06/09/2022 09:55, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 08:40:23AM +0000, Conor.Dooley at microchip.com wrote:
> >> On 06/09/2022 09:35, Andrew Jones wrote:
> >>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> >>>
> >>> Provide an info message with the block size when the Zicbom extension is
> >>> present and the block size has been determined.
> >>
> >> Why might someone care about this?
> >
> > I was unaware of anywhere else besides hardware descriptions where this is
> > published. And, while dmesg isn't really publishing it in a way that is
> > useful to anything other than human readers either, it at least makes it
> > easy for a user to check it for sanity purposes (which is what I used it
> > for) or even for applying it if they want to write something that needs it
> > and the OS provides U-mode access to CMO.
> >
> > I'm not married to the idea, though, so if people would rather have less
> > logs than this information, then I'm fine with dropping the patch.
>
> I don't really care either way about logging it, if it helps people to
> be able to see it perhaps there's a better location than dmesg -
> would {debug,sys}fs be overkill?
Thinking about this some more, I think sysfs would probably be the better
way to go from the start. This patch should probably be dropped and I
can try to add a sysfs node. The hard part of that will be the naming...
How about
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cache/cmo_block_size
Thanks,
drew
>
> I was just more interested in the motivation behind the change itself.
> Maybe some of the above in the commit message wuld be nice?
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > drew
> >
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <ajones at ventanamicro.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c | 4 +++-
> >>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c b/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c
> >>> index e5b087be1577..8595baf8e403 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c
> >>> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c
> >>> @@ -122,7 +122,9 @@ void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void)
> >>> }
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> - if (probed_block_size)
> >>> + if (probed_block_size) {
> >>> riscv_cbom_block_size = probed_block_size;
> >>> + pr_info("riscv: Zicbom: Cache blocksize is %u bytes", probed_block_size);
> >>> + }
> >>> }
> >>> #endif
> >>> --
> >>> 2.37.2
> >>>
> >>
>
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list