[PATCH v2 2/6] soc: sifive: ccache: Rename SiFive L2 cache to Composable cache.

Conor.Dooley at microchip.com Conor.Dooley at microchip.com
Mon Sep 5 23:23:18 PDT 2022


On 06/09/2022 02:44, Zong Li wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> <Conor.Dooley at microchip.com> 於 2022年9月6日 週二 凌晨2:48寫道:
>>
>> Noticed a another thing, sorry..
>>
>> On 05/09/2022 09:31, Zong Li wrote:
>>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>>
>>> From: Greentime Hu <greentime.hu at sifive.com>
>>>
>>> Since composable cache may be L3 cache if pL2 cache exists, we should use
>>> its original name composable cache to prevent confusion.
>>>
>>> Apart from renaming, we also add the compatible "sifive,ccache0" into ID
>>> table.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Greentime Hu <greentime.hu at sifive.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zong Li <zong.li at sifive.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/soc/sifive/Kconfig                    |   6 +-
>>>   drivers/soc/sifive/Makefile                   |   2 +-
>>>   .../{sifive_l2_cache.c => sifive_ccache.c}    | 163 +++++++++---------
>>>   .../{sifive_l2_cache.h => sifive_ccache.h}    |  16 +-
>>>   4 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
>>>   rename drivers/soc/sifive/{sifive_l2_cache.c => sifive_ccache.c} (35%)
>>>   rename include/soc/sifive/{sifive_l2_cache.h => sifive_ccache.h} (12%)
>>>
>>
>>> -static ssize_t l2_write(struct file *file, const char __user *data,
>>> +static ssize_t ccache_write(struct file *file, const char __user *data,
>>>                          size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
>>
>> You need to fix the alignment here as per checkpatch:
>> CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
>> #112: FILE: drivers/soc/sifive/sifive_ccache.c:53:
>> +static ssize_t ccache_write(struct file *file, const char __user *data,
>> +                       size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
>>
> 
> I'm not sure why I don't see that by checkpatch, but it looks that it
> is actually misalignment there, I would re-check all indents in
> source. Thanks.

You need to pass --strict to checkpatch to see it.

> 
>>>   {
>>>          unsigned int val;
>>> @@ -57,75 +57,76 @@ static ssize_t l2_write(struct file *file, const char __user *data,
>>>          if (kstrtouint_from_user(data, count, 0, &val))
>>>                  return -EINVAL;
>>>          if ((val < 0xFF) || (val >= 0x10000 && val < 0x100FF))
>>> -               writel(val, l2_base + SIFIVE_L2_ECCINJECTERR);
>>> +               writel(val, ccache_base + SIFIVE_CCACHE_ECCINJECTERR);
>>>          else
>>>                  return -EINVAL;
>>>          return count;
>>>   }
>>>



More information about the linux-riscv mailing list