[PATCH v2 4/5] riscv: use BIT() marco for cpufeature probing
Conor.Dooley at microchip.com
Conor.Dooley at microchip.com
Mon Sep 5 04:19:41 PDT 2022
On 05/09/2022 12:10, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> Using the appropriate BIT macro makes the code better readable.
>
> Suggested-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko at sntech.de>
Missing the cover-letter with the changelog?
At least, I didn't get it in my inbox. Either way,
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index 729f7a218093..08f7445985dc 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -289,10 +289,10 @@ static u32 __init_or_module cpufeature_probe(unsigned int stage)
> u32 cpu_req_feature = 0;
>
> if (cpufeature_probe_svpbmt(stage))
> - cpu_req_feature |= (1U << CPUFEATURE_SVPBMT);
> + cpu_req_feature |= BIT(CPUFEATURE_SVPBMT);
>
> if (cpufeature_probe_zicbom(stage))
> - cpu_req_feature |= (1U << CPUFEATURE_ZICBOM);
> + cpu_req_feature |= BIT(CPUFEATURE_ZICBOM);
>
> return cpu_req_feature;
> }
> --
> 2.35.1
>
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list