[PATCH 3/3] RISC-V: Ensure Zicbom has a valid block size
Conor Dooley
conor at kernel.org
Sun Oct 23 12:38:55 PDT 2022
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 12:59:05PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> When a DT puts zicbom in the isa string, but does not provide a block
> size, ALT_CMO_OP() will attempt to do cache operations on address
> zero since the start address will be ANDed with zero. We can't simply
> BUG() in riscv_init_cbom_blocksize() when we fail to find a block
> size because the failure will happen before logging works, leaving
> users to scratch their heads as to why the boot hung. Instead, ensure
> Zicbom is disabled and output an error which will hopefully alert
> people that the DT needs to be fixed. While at it, add a check that
> the block size is a power-of-2 too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <ajones at ventanamicro.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index 220be7222129..a4430a77df53 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> #include <linux/bitmap.h>
> #include <linux/ctype.h>
> #include <linux/libfdt.h>
> +#include <linux/log2.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <asm/alternative.h>
> @@ -70,6 +71,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__riscv_isa_extension_available);
>
> static bool riscv_isa_extension_check(int id)
> {
> + switch (id) {
> + case RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOM:
> + if (!riscv_cbom_block_size) {
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM))
Maybe I've missed something... Why not check if !IS_ENABLED() & return
false immediately rather than doing it inside the attribute checks?
I'll be compiled out of zicbom is enabled, so not like the non-error
patch will be penalised with an extra check.
> + pr_err("cbom-block-size not found, cannot use Zicbom\n");
> + return false;
> + } else if (!is_power_of_2(riscv_cbom_block_size)) {
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM))
> + pr_err("cbom-block-size is not a power-of-2, cannot use Zicbom\n");
> + return false;
> + }
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> return true;
> }
>
> --
> 2.37.3
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list