[PATCH 1/4] Documentation: RISC-V: Fix a typo in patch-acceptance

[Anup Patel]

On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 10:26 AM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at rivosinc.com> wrote:
>
> From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at rivosinc.com>
>
> I just stumbled on this when modifying the docs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at rivosinc.com>

Looks good to me from a KVM RISC-V perspective.

Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup at brainfault.org>

Regards,
Anup

> ---
>  Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst b/Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst
> index dfe0ac5624fb..5da6f9b273d6 100644
> --- a/Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ their own custom extensions.  These custom extensions aren't required
>  to go through any review or ratification process by the RISC-V
>  Foundation.  To avoid the maintenance complexity and potential
>  performance impact of adding kernel code for implementor-specific
> -RISC-V extensions, we'll only to accept patches for extensions that
> +RISC-V extensions, we'll only accept patches for extensions that
>  have been officially frozen or ratified by the RISC-V Foundation.
>  (Implementors, may, of course, maintain their own Linux kernel trees
>  containing code for any custom extensions that they wish.)
> --
> 2.38.0
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv