[PATCH] Fixed styling in riscv ucontext header
Conor Dooley
conor at kernel.org
Sun Oct 9 05:14:52 PDT 2022
Hey Cleo,
On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 02:03:40PM +0200, Cleo John wrote:
> Fixed styling in riscv ucontext header
This should probably be "riscv: fix styling..."
> This patch changes the two comments in ucontext.h by getting them up to the cody style proposed by torwalds.
s/This patch changes/Change
Looks like some typos here too & your lines need to be wrapped at 72
characters for commit messages. git usually enforces that automatically
when you do a `git commit`.
> In my opinion this also improves the readability so I think this is a useful change to do.
> Please also tell me if you have a different opinion.
FYI commentary on the patch should go below the ---.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cleo John <waterdev at galaxycrow.de>
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ucontext.h | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ucontext.h b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ucontext.h
> index 44eb993950e5..0cd6f8616985 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ucontext.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ucontext.h
> @@ -18,7 +18,8 @@ struct ucontext {
> /* There's some padding here to allow sigset_t to be expanded in the
Why fix the closing comment but leave the opening ones incorrect?
Thanks,
Conor.
> * future. Though this is unlikely, other architectures put uc_sigmask
> * at the end of this structure and explicitly state it can be
> - * expanded, so we didn't want to box ourselves in here. */
> + * expanded, so we didn't want to box ourselves in here.
> + */
> __u8 __unused[1024 / 8 - sizeof(sigset_t)];
> /* We can't put uc_sigmask at the end of this structure because we need
> * to be able to expand sigcontext in the future. For example, the
> @@ -27,7 +28,8 @@ struct ucontext {
> * ucontext, so we're putting this at the end in order to allow for
> * infinite extensibility. Since we know this will be extended and we
> * assume sigset_t won't be extended an extreme amount, we're
> - * prioritizing this. */
> + * prioritizing this.
> + */
> struct sigcontext uc_mcontext;
> };
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list