[syzbot] riscv/fixes boot error: can't ssh into the instance
Alexandre Ghiti
alex at ghiti.fr
Sat May 28 01:13:18 PDT 2022
On 5/28/22 00:50, Atish Patra wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 12:33 AM Alexandre Ghiti
> <alexandre.ghiti at canonical.com> wrote:
>> Hi Atish,
>>
>> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 11:02 AM Atish Patra <atishp at atishpatra.org> wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 1:11 AM Atish Patra <atishp at atishpatra.org> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 5:06 AM Alexandre Ghiti <alex at ghiti.fr> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/12/22 13:48, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 18 Feb 2022 at 14:45, Alexandre Ghiti
>>>>>> <alexandre.ghiti at canonical.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Aleksandr,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 6:08 PM Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh at google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 5:53 PM Alexandre Ghiti
>>>>>>>> <alexandre.ghiti at canonical.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Aleksandr,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 5:58 PM Alexandre Ghiti
>>>>>>>>> <alexandre.ghiti at canonical.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> First, thank you for working on this.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 5:17 PM Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh at google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> If I use just defconfig + DEBUG_VIRTUAL, without any KASAN, it begins
>>>>>>>>>>> to boot, but overwhelms me with tons of `virt_to_phys used for
>>>>>>>>>>> non-linear address:` errors.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Like that
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [ 2.701271] virt_to_phys used for non-linear address:
>>>>>>>>>>> 00000000b59e31b6 (0xffffffff806c2000)
>>>>>>>>>>> [ 2.701727] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at arch/riscv/mm/physaddr.c:16
>>>>>>>>>>> __virt_to_phys+0x7e/0x86
>>>>>>>>>>> [ 2.702207] Modules linked in:
>>>>>>>>>>> [ 2.702393] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W
>>>>>>>>>>> 5.17.0-rc1 #1
>>>>>>>>>>> [ 2.702806] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
>>>>>>>>>>> [ 2.703051] epc : __virt_to_phys+0x7e/0x86
>>>>>>>>>>> [ 2.703298] ra : __virt_to_phys+0x7e/0x86
>>>>>>>>>>> [ 2.703547] epc : ffffffff80008448 ra : ffffffff80008448 sp :
>>>>>>>>>>> ffff8f800021bde0
>>>>>>>>>>> [ 2.703977] gp : ffffffff80ed9b30 tp : ffffaf8001230000 t0 :
>>>>>>>>>>> ffffffff80eea56f
>>>>>>>>>>> [ 2.704704] t1 : ffffffff80eea560 t2 : 0000000000000000 s0 :
>>>>>>>>>>> ffff8f800021be00
>>>>>>>>>>> [ 2.705153] s1 : ffffffff806c2000 a0 : 000000000000004f a1 :
>>>>>>>>>>> ffffffff80e723d8
>>>>>>>>>>> [ 2.705555] a2 : 0000000000000010 a3 : fffffffffffffffe a4 :
>>>>>>>>>>> 0000000000000000
>>>>>>>>>>> [ 2.706027] a5 : 0000000000000000 a6 : 0000000000000005 a7 :
>>>>>>>>>>> ffffffffffffffff
>>>>>>>>>>> [ 2.706474] s2 : ffffffff80b80b08 s3 : 00000000000000c2 s4 :
>>>>>>>>>>> ffffffff806c2000
>>>>>>>>>>> [ 2.706891] s5 : ffffffff80edba10 s6 : ffffffff80edb960 s7 :
>>>>>>>>>>> 0000000000000001
>>>>>>>>>>> [ 2.707290] s8 : 00000000000000ff s9 : ffffffff80b80b40 s10:
>>>>>>>>>>> 00000000000000cc
>>>>>>>>>>> [ 2.707689] s11: ffffaf807e1fcf00 t3 : 0000000000000076 t4 :
>>>>>>>>>>> ffffffffffffffff
>>>>>>>>>>> [ 2.708092] t5 : 00000000000001f2 t6 : ffff8f800021bb48
>>>>>>>>>>> [ 2.708433] status: 0000000000000120 badaddr: 0000000000000000
>>>>>>>>>>> cause: 0000000000000003
>>>>>>>>>>> [ 2.708919] [<ffffffff8011416a>] free_reserved_area+0x72/0x19a
>>>>>>>>>>> [ 2.709296] [<ffffffff80003a5a>] free_initmem+0x6c/0x7c
>>>>>>>>>>> [ 2.709648] [<ffffffff805f60c8>] kernel_init+0x3a/0x10a
>>>>>>>>>>> [ 2.709993] [<ffffffff80002fda>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0xc
>>>>>>>>>>> [ 2.710310] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I was able to reproduce this: the first one regarding init_zero_pfn is
>>>>>>>>>> legit but not wrong, I have to check when it was introduced and how to
>>>>>>>>>> fix this.
>>>>>>>>>> Regarding the huge batch that follows, at first sight, I would say
>>>>>>>>>> this is linked to my sv48 patchset but that does not seem important as
>>>>>>>>>> the address is a kernel mapping address so the use of virt_to_phys is
>>>>>>>>>> right.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 5:09 PM Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh at google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:56 PM Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov at google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 at 12:47, Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh at google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 11:37 AM Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh at google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 5:14 AM Alexandre Ghiti <alex at ghiti.fr> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Dmitry,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/15/22 18:12, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 at 14:18, Alexandre Ghiti
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <alexandre.ghiti at canonical.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Aleksandr,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 12:08 PM Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh at google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> syzbot has already not been able to fuzz its RISC-V instance for 97
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's a longtime, I'll take a look more regularly.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> days now because the compiled kernel cannot boot. I bisected the issue
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the following commit:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit 54c5639d8f507ebefa814f574cb6f763033a72a5
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Author: Alexandre Ghiti <alexandre.ghiti at canonical.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Fri Oct 29 06:59:27 2021 +0200
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> riscv: Fix asan-stack clang build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apparently, the problem appears on GCC-built RISC-V kernels with KASAN
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enabled. In the previous message syzbot mentions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2", but the issue also reproduces finely on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a newer GCC compiler: "riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 11.2.0-10)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 11.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.37".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For convenience, I also duplicate the .config file from the bot's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=522544a2e0ef2a7d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can someone with KASAN and RISC-V expertise please take a look?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll take a look at that today.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for reporting the issue,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I took a quick look, not enough to fix it but I know the issue comes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from the inline instrumentation, I have no problem with the outline
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instrumentation. I need to find some cycles to work on this, my goal is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to fix this for 5.17.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the update!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you please share the .config with which you tested the outline
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instrumentation?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I updated the syzbot config to use KASAN_OUTLINE instead of KASAN_INLINE,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but it still does not boot :(
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's what I used:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://gist.github.com/a-nogikh/279c85c2d24f47efcc3e865c08844138
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Update: it doesn't boot with that big config, but boots if I generate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a simple one with KASAN_OUTLINE:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make defconfig ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./scripts/config -e KASAN -e KASAN_OUTLINE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make olddefconfig ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And it indeed doesn't work if I use KASAN_INLINE.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It may be an issue with code size. Full syzbot config + KASAN + KCOV
>>>>>>>>>>>>> produce hugely massive .text. It may be hitting some limitation in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> bootloader/kernel bootstrap code.
>>>>>>>>>> I took a quick glance and it traps on a KASAN address that is not
>>>>>>>>>> mapped, either because it is too soon or because the mapping failed
>>>>>>>>>> somehow.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'll definitely dive into that tomorrow, sorry for being slow here and
>>>>>>>>>> thanks again for all your work, that helps a lot.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I bisected the difference between the config we use on syzbot and the
>>>>>>>>>>>> simple one that was generated like I described above.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Turns out that it's the DEBUG_VIRTUAL config that makes the difference.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> make defconfig ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu-
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./scripts/config -e KASAN -e KASAN_OUTLINE -e DEBUG_VIRTUAL
>>>>>>>>>>>> make olddefconfig ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And the resulting kernel does not boot.
>>>>>>>>>>>> My env: the `riscv/fixes` branch, commit
>>>>>>>>>>>> 6df2a016c0c8a3d0933ef33dd192ea6606b115e3, qemu 6.2.0.
>>>>>>>>> I fixed a few things today: KASAN + SPARSE_VMEMMAP, DEBUG_VIRTUAL and
>>>>>>>>> maybe KASAN + KCOV.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> With those small fixes, I was able to boot your large dotconfig with
>>>>>>>>> KASAN_OUTLINE, the inline version still fails, this is my next target
>>>>>>>>> :)
>>>>>>>>> I'll push that tomorrow!
>>>>>>>> Awesome, thank you very much!
>>>>>>>> Looking forward to finally seeing the instance run :)
>>>>>>> I sent a patchset which should fix your config with *outline* instrumentation.
>>>>>> Was this fix merged? The riscv instance still does not boot:
>>>>>> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=5f2ff52ad42cba9f222202219baebd4e63e35127
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes it has been in Linus tree since 5.18-rc1. I'll take a look at that
>>>>> this week.
>>>>>
>>>> Are you seeing this error or a different one ? I used the
>>>> syzkaller_defconfig from the patch below on v5.18.
>>>>
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220419174952.699-1-palmer@rivosinc.com/
>>>>
>>>> [ 15.076116][ T1] Mandatory Access Control activated.
>>>> [ 15.158241][ T1] AppArmor: AppArmor Filesystem Enabled
>>>> [ 16.150870][ T1] NET: Registered PF_INET protocol family
>>>> [ 16.166167][ T1] IP idents hash table entries: 32768 (order: 6,
>>>> 262144 bytes, linear)
>>>> [ 16.188727][ T1] Unable to handle kernel paging request at
>>>> virtual address ffebfffeffff2000
>>>> [ 16.192727][ T1] Oops [#1]
>>>> [ 16.193479][ T1] Modules linked in:
>>>> [ 16.194687][ T1] CPU: 3 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted
>>>> 5.18.0-00001-g37ac279268bf-dirty #9
>>>> [ 16.196486][ T1] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
>>>> [ 16.197836][ T1] epc : kasan_check_range+0x9e/0x14e
>>>> [ 16.199104][ T1] ra : memset+0x1e/0x4c
>>>> [ 16.200091][ T1] epc : ffffffff804787e0 ra : ffffffff80478f30 sp
>>>> : ff600000073ffb70
>>>> [ 16.201420][ T1] gp : ffffffff85879e80 tp : ff600000073f0000 t0
>>>> : 7300000000000000
>>>> [ 16.202762][ T1] t1 : ffebfffeffff21ff t2 : 73746e6564692050 s0
>>>> : ff600000073ffba0
>>>> [ 16.204047][ T1] s1 : 0000000000001000 a0 : ffebfffeffff2200 a1
>>>> : 0000000000001000
>>>> [ 16.205312][ T1] a2 : 0000000000000001 a3 : ffffffff803a4f32 a4
>>>> : ff5ffffffff90000
>>>> [ 16.206592][ T1] a5 : ffebfffeffff2000 a6 : 0000004000000000 a7
>>>> : ff5ffffffff90fff
>>>> [ 16.207865][ T1] s2 : ff5ffffffff90000 s3 : 0000000000000000 s4
>>>> : ffffffff8467ea90
>>>> [ 16.209134][ T1] s5 : 0000000000000000 s6 : ff5ffffffff90000 s7
>>>> : 0000000000000000
>>>> [ 16.210394][ T1] s8 : 0000000000001000 s9 : ffffffff8587ca40
>>>> s10: 0000000000000004
>>>> [ 16.211952][ T1] s11: ffffffff858a03a0 t3 : 0000000000000000 t4
>>>> : 0000000000000040
>>>> [ 16.213469][ T1] t5 : ffebfffeffff2200 t6 : ff600000073ff738
>>>> [ 16.214853][ T1] status: 0000000200000120 badaddr:
>>>> ffebfffeffff2000 cause: 000000000000000d
>>>> [ 16.216910][ T1] Call Trace:
>>>> [ 16.217816][ T1] [<ffffffff803a4f32>] pcpu_alloc+0x844/0x1254
>>>> [ 16.219110][ T1] [<ffffffff803a59a0>] __alloc_percpu+0x28/0x34
>>>> [ 16.220244][ T1] [<ffffffff8328824a>] ip_rt_init+0x17e/0x382
>>>> [ 16.221606][ T1] [<ffffffff8328861c>] ip_init+0x18/0x30
>>>> [ 16.222719][ T1] [<ffffffff8328a0ee>] inet_init+0x2a6/0x550
>>>> [ 16.223863][ T1] [<ffffffff80003204>] do_one_initcall+0x130/0x7dc
>>>> [ 16.225002][ T1] [<ffffffff83201fbc>] kernel_init_freeable+0x510/0x5b4
>>>> [ 16.226273][ T1] [<ffffffff8319842a>] kernel_init+0x28/0x21c
>>>> [ 16.227337][ T1] [<ffffffff80005818>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0x10
>>>> [ 16.229910][ T1] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
>>>> [ 16.231880][ T1] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Enabling CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC=y solves the issue and I am able to boot
>>> to the userspace.
>>> I have tried enabling/disabling CONFIG_VMAP_STACK as well. Both works fine.
>>>
>>> Looking at the ARM64 Kconfig, KASAN_VMALLOC is enabled if KASAN is enabled.
>>> This diff seems to work for me.
>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
>>> index 00fd9c548f26..cbf0fe227c77 100644
>>> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
>>> @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ config RISCV
>>> select TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT
>>> select UACCESS_MEMCPY if !MMU
>>> select ZONE_DMA32 if 64BIT
>>> + select KASAN_VMALLOC if KASAN
>>>
>>> I am not a kasan expert so I am not sure if this is the correct fix or
>>> just hides the real issue. pcpu_alloc seems to use vmalloc though.
>> When this type of thing happens, generally this is because of an error
>> in the kasan page table, I'll take a look this time, sorry I did not
>> do this before.
>>
> No worries. But the above diff is applicable anyways. Correct ?
Yes, we can use that until I fix the underlying issue.
>
>> Thanks for finding this,
>>
>> Alex
>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Alex
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> However, as you'll see in the cover letter, I have an issue with
>>>>>>> another KASAN config and if you can take a look at the stacktrace and
>>>>>>> see if that rings a bell, that would be great.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Don't hesitate next time to ping me when the riscv syzbot instance fails :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>> Aleksandr
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks again,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "kasan-dev" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kasan-dev+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kasan-dev/CA%2BzEjCtB0rTuNAJkrM2q3JQL7D-9fAXBo0Ud0w__gy9CAfo_Ag%40mail.gmail.com.
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> linux-riscv mailing list
>>>>> linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org
>>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Atish
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Atish
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Atish
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list