[syzbot] riscv/fixes boot error: can't ssh into the instance
Atish Patra
atishp at atishpatra.org
Thu May 26 01:11:15 PDT 2022
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 5:06 AM Alexandre Ghiti <alex at ghiti.fr> wrote:
>
>
> On 5/12/22 13:48, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Feb 2022 at 14:45, Alexandre Ghiti
> > <alexandre.ghiti at canonical.com> wrote:
> >> Hi Aleksandr,
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 6:08 PM Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh at google.com> wrote:
> >>> Hi Alex,
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 5:53 PM Alexandre Ghiti
> >>> <alexandre.ghiti at canonical.com> wrote:
> >>>> Aleksandr,
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 5:58 PM Alexandre Ghiti
> >>>> <alexandre.ghiti at canonical.com> wrote:
> >>>>> First, thank you for working on this.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 5:17 PM Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh at google.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> If I use just defconfig + DEBUG_VIRTUAL, without any KASAN, it begins
> >>>>>> to boot, but overwhelms me with tons of `virt_to_phys used for
> >>>>>> non-linear address:` errors.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Like that
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [ 2.701271] virt_to_phys used for non-linear address:
> >>>>>> 00000000b59e31b6 (0xffffffff806c2000)
> >>>>>> [ 2.701727] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at arch/riscv/mm/physaddr.c:16
> >>>>>> __virt_to_phys+0x7e/0x86
> >>>>>> [ 2.702207] Modules linked in:
> >>>>>> [ 2.702393] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W
> >>>>>> 5.17.0-rc1 #1
> >>>>>> [ 2.702806] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
> >>>>>> [ 2.703051] epc : __virt_to_phys+0x7e/0x86
> >>>>>> [ 2.703298] ra : __virt_to_phys+0x7e/0x86
> >>>>>> [ 2.703547] epc : ffffffff80008448 ra : ffffffff80008448 sp :
> >>>>>> ffff8f800021bde0
> >>>>>> [ 2.703977] gp : ffffffff80ed9b30 tp : ffffaf8001230000 t0 :
> >>>>>> ffffffff80eea56f
> >>>>>> [ 2.704704] t1 : ffffffff80eea560 t2 : 0000000000000000 s0 :
> >>>>>> ffff8f800021be00
> >>>>>> [ 2.705153] s1 : ffffffff806c2000 a0 : 000000000000004f a1 :
> >>>>>> ffffffff80e723d8
> >>>>>> [ 2.705555] a2 : 0000000000000010 a3 : fffffffffffffffe a4 :
> >>>>>> 0000000000000000
> >>>>>> [ 2.706027] a5 : 0000000000000000 a6 : 0000000000000005 a7 :
> >>>>>> ffffffffffffffff
> >>>>>> [ 2.706474] s2 : ffffffff80b80b08 s3 : 00000000000000c2 s4 :
> >>>>>> ffffffff806c2000
> >>>>>> [ 2.706891] s5 : ffffffff80edba10 s6 : ffffffff80edb960 s7 :
> >>>>>> 0000000000000001
> >>>>>> [ 2.707290] s8 : 00000000000000ff s9 : ffffffff80b80b40 s10:
> >>>>>> 00000000000000cc
> >>>>>> [ 2.707689] s11: ffffaf807e1fcf00 t3 : 0000000000000076 t4 :
> >>>>>> ffffffffffffffff
> >>>>>> [ 2.708092] t5 : 00000000000001f2 t6 : ffff8f800021bb48
> >>>>>> [ 2.708433] status: 0000000000000120 badaddr: 0000000000000000
> >>>>>> cause: 0000000000000003
> >>>>>> [ 2.708919] [<ffffffff8011416a>] free_reserved_area+0x72/0x19a
> >>>>>> [ 2.709296] [<ffffffff80003a5a>] free_initmem+0x6c/0x7c
> >>>>>> [ 2.709648] [<ffffffff805f60c8>] kernel_init+0x3a/0x10a
> >>>>>> [ 2.709993] [<ffffffff80002fda>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0xc
> >>>>>> [ 2.710310] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> I was able to reproduce this: the first one regarding init_zero_pfn is
> >>>>> legit but not wrong, I have to check when it was introduced and how to
> >>>>> fix this.
> >>>>> Regarding the huge batch that follows, at first sight, I would say
> >>>>> this is linked to my sv48 patchset but that does not seem important as
> >>>>> the address is a kernel mapping address so the use of virt_to_phys is
> >>>>> right.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 5:09 PM Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh at google.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:56 PM Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov at google.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 at 12:47, Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh at google.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 11:37 AM Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh at google.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 5:14 AM Alexandre Ghiti <alex at ghiti.fr> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Dmitry,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 2/15/22 18:12, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 at 14:18, Alexandre Ghiti
> >>>>>>>>>>>> <alexandre.ghiti at canonical.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Aleksandr,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 12:08 PM Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh at google.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> syzbot has already not been able to fuzz its RISC-V instance for 97
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> That's a longtime, I'll take a look more regularly.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> days now because the compiled kernel cannot boot. I bisected the issue
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the following commit:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit 54c5639d8f507ebefa814f574cb6f763033a72a5
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Author: Alexandre Ghiti <alexandre.ghiti at canonical.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Fri Oct 29 06:59:27 2021 +0200
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> riscv: Fix asan-stack clang build
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apparently, the problem appears on GCC-built RISC-V kernels with KASAN
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> enabled. In the previous message syzbot mentions
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2", but the issue also reproduces finely on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a newer GCC compiler: "riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 11.2.0-10)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 11.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.37".
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For convenience, I also duplicate the .config file from the bot's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> message: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=522544a2e0ef2a7d
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can someone with KASAN and RISC-V expertise please take a look?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll take a look at that today.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for reporting the issue,
> >>>>>>>>>>> I took a quick look, not enough to fix it but I know the issue comes
> >>>>>>>>>>> from the inline instrumentation, I have no problem with the outline
> >>>>>>>>>>> instrumentation. I need to find some cycles to work on this, my goal is
> >>>>>>>>>>> to fix this for 5.17.
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the update!
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Can you please share the .config with which you tested the outline
> >>>>>>>>>> instrumentation?
> >>>>>>>>>> I updated the syzbot config to use KASAN_OUTLINE instead of KASAN_INLINE,
> >>>>>>>>>> but it still does not boot :(
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Here's what I used:
> >>>>>>>>>> https://gist.github.com/a-nogikh/279c85c2d24f47efcc3e865c08844138
> >>>>>>>>> Update: it doesn't boot with that big config, but boots if I generate
> >>>>>>>>> a simple one with KASAN_OUTLINE:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> make defconfig ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu-
> >>>>>>>>> ./scripts/config -e KASAN -e KASAN_OUTLINE
> >>>>>>>>> make olddefconfig ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu-
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> And it indeed doesn't work if I use KASAN_INLINE.
> >>>>>>>> It may be an issue with code size. Full syzbot config + KASAN + KCOV
> >>>>>>>> produce hugely massive .text. It may be hitting some limitation in the
> >>>>>>>> bootloader/kernel bootstrap code.
> >>>>> I took a quick glance and it traps on a KASAN address that is not
> >>>>> mapped, either because it is too soon or because the mapping failed
> >>>>> somehow.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'll definitely dive into that tomorrow, sorry for being slow here and
> >>>>> thanks again for all your work, that helps a lot.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Alex
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> I bisected the difference between the config we use on syzbot and the
> >>>>>>> simple one that was generated like I described above.
> >>>>>>> Turns out that it's the DEBUG_VIRTUAL config that makes the difference.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> make defconfig ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu-
> >>>>>>> ./scripts/config -e KASAN -e KASAN_OUTLINE -e DEBUG_VIRTUAL
> >>>>>>> make olddefconfig ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu-
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> And the resulting kernel does not boot.
> >>>>>>> My env: the `riscv/fixes` branch, commit
> >>>>>>> 6df2a016c0c8a3d0933ef33dd192ea6606b115e3, qemu 6.2.0.
> >>>> I fixed a few things today: KASAN + SPARSE_VMEMMAP, DEBUG_VIRTUAL and
> >>>> maybe KASAN + KCOV.
> >>>>
> >>>> With those small fixes, I was able to boot your large dotconfig with
> >>>> KASAN_OUTLINE, the inline version still fails, this is my next target
> >>>> :)
> >>>> I'll push that tomorrow!
> >>> Awesome, thank you very much!
> >>> Looking forward to finally seeing the instance run :)
> >> I sent a patchset which should fix your config with *outline* instrumentation.
> > Was this fix merged? The riscv instance still does not boot:
> > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=5f2ff52ad42cba9f222202219baebd4e63e35127
>
>
> Yes it has been in Linus tree since 5.18-rc1. I'll take a look at that
> this week.
>
Are you seeing this error or a different one ? I used the
syzkaller_defconfig from the patch below on v5.18.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220419174952.699-1-palmer@rivosinc.com/
[ 15.076116][ T1] Mandatory Access Control activated.
[ 15.158241][ T1] AppArmor: AppArmor Filesystem Enabled
[ 16.150870][ T1] NET: Registered PF_INET protocol family
[ 16.166167][ T1] IP idents hash table entries: 32768 (order: 6,
262144 bytes, linear)
[ 16.188727][ T1] Unable to handle kernel paging request at
virtual address ffebfffeffff2000
[ 16.192727][ T1] Oops [#1]
[ 16.193479][ T1] Modules linked in:
[ 16.194687][ T1] CPU: 3 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted
5.18.0-00001-g37ac279268bf-dirty #9
[ 16.196486][ T1] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
[ 16.197836][ T1] epc : kasan_check_range+0x9e/0x14e
[ 16.199104][ T1] ra : memset+0x1e/0x4c
[ 16.200091][ T1] epc : ffffffff804787e0 ra : ffffffff80478f30 sp
: ff600000073ffb70
[ 16.201420][ T1] gp : ffffffff85879e80 tp : ff600000073f0000 t0
: 7300000000000000
[ 16.202762][ T1] t1 : ffebfffeffff21ff t2 : 73746e6564692050 s0
: ff600000073ffba0
[ 16.204047][ T1] s1 : 0000000000001000 a0 : ffebfffeffff2200 a1
: 0000000000001000
[ 16.205312][ T1] a2 : 0000000000000001 a3 : ffffffff803a4f32 a4
: ff5ffffffff90000
[ 16.206592][ T1] a5 : ffebfffeffff2000 a6 : 0000004000000000 a7
: ff5ffffffff90fff
[ 16.207865][ T1] s2 : ff5ffffffff90000 s3 : 0000000000000000 s4
: ffffffff8467ea90
[ 16.209134][ T1] s5 : 0000000000000000 s6 : ff5ffffffff90000 s7
: 0000000000000000
[ 16.210394][ T1] s8 : 0000000000001000 s9 : ffffffff8587ca40
s10: 0000000000000004
[ 16.211952][ T1] s11: ffffffff858a03a0 t3 : 0000000000000000 t4
: 0000000000000040
[ 16.213469][ T1] t5 : ffebfffeffff2200 t6 : ff600000073ff738
[ 16.214853][ T1] status: 0000000200000120 badaddr:
ffebfffeffff2000 cause: 000000000000000d
[ 16.216910][ T1] Call Trace:
[ 16.217816][ T1] [<ffffffff803a4f32>] pcpu_alloc+0x844/0x1254
[ 16.219110][ T1] [<ffffffff803a59a0>] __alloc_percpu+0x28/0x34
[ 16.220244][ T1] [<ffffffff8328824a>] ip_rt_init+0x17e/0x382
[ 16.221606][ T1] [<ffffffff8328861c>] ip_init+0x18/0x30
[ 16.222719][ T1] [<ffffffff8328a0ee>] inet_init+0x2a6/0x550
[ 16.223863][ T1] [<ffffffff80003204>] do_one_initcall+0x130/0x7dc
[ 16.225002][ T1] [<ffffffff83201fbc>] kernel_init_freeable+0x510/0x5b4
[ 16.226273][ T1] [<ffffffff8319842a>] kernel_init+0x28/0x21c
[ 16.227337][ T1] [<ffffffff80005818>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0x10
[ 16.229910][ T1] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
[ 16.231880][ T1] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
> Thanks,
>
> Alex
>
>
> >
> >> However, as you'll see in the cover letter, I have an issue with
> >> another KASAN config and if you can take a look at the stacktrace and
> >> see if that rings a bell, that would be great.
> >>
> >> Don't hesitate next time to ping me when the riscv syzbot instance fails :)
> >>
> >> Alex
> >>
> >>
> >>> --
> >>> Best Regards,
> >>> Aleksandr
> >>>
> >>>> Thanks again,
> >>>>
> >>>> Alex
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "kasan-dev" group.
> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kasan-dev+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
> >> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kasan-dev/CA%2BzEjCtB0rTuNAJkrM2q3JQL7D-9fAXBo0Ud0w__gy9CAfo_Ag%40mail.gmail.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
--
Regards,
Atish
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list