[PATCH -next v2 1/3] RISC-V: add Bitmanip/Scalar Crypto parsing from DT

Zenithal i at zenithal.me
Wed May 18 04:04:28 PDT 2022


On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 09:50:18AM +0000, Conor.Dooley at microchip.com wrote:
> On 18/05/2022 10:25, Hongren (Zenithal) Zheng wrote:
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> > 
> > This commit parses Zb/Zk related string from DT and
> > output them in cpuinfo
> 
> Similarly here, the typical "this patch" comment.

Will fix in the next version.

> 
> > 
> > One thing worth noting is that if DT provides zk,
> > all zbkb, zbkc, zbkx and zkn, zkr, zkt would be enabled.
> > 
> > Note that zk is a valid extension name and the current
> > DT binding spec allows this.
> > 
> > This commit also changes the logical id of
> 
> "also" makes it sound like this a separate change?
> If so, split it into another patch.

No, adding Zba naturally changes the logical id.
I think it would be strange the first patch appends Zba
then the second patch moves Zba to the beginning of the list

> 
> > existing multi-letter extensions and adds a statement
> > that instead of logical id compatibility, the order
> > is needed.
> > 
> > There currently lacks a mechanism to merge them when
> > producing cpuinfo. Namely if you provide a riscv,isa
> > "rv64imafdc_zk_zks", the cpuinfo output would be
> > "rv64imafdc_zbkb_zbkc_zbkx_zknd_zkne_zknh_zkr_zksed
> > _zksh_zkt"
> > 
> > Tested-by: Jiatai He <jiatai2021 at iscas.ac.cn>
> > Signed-off-by: Hongren (Zenithal) Zheng <i at zenithal.me>



More information about the linux-riscv mailing list