[PATCH] perf: RISC-V: Remove non-kernel-doc ** comments

[Atish Patra]

On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 3:02 PM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at rivosinc.com> wrote:
>
> From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at rivosinc.com>
>
> This will presumably trip up some tools that try to parse the comments
> as kernel doc when they're not.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp at intel.com>
> Fixes: 4905ec2fb7e6 ("RISC-V: Add sscofpmf extension support")
> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at rivosinc.com>
>
> --
>
> These recently landed in for-next, but I'm trying to avoid rewriting
> history as there's a lot in flight right now.
> ---
>  drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> index a1317a483512..dca3537a8dcc 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ union sbi_pmu_ctr_info {
>         };
>  };
>
> -/**
> +/*
>   * RISC-V doesn't have hetergenous harts yet. This need to be part of
>   * per_cpu in case of harts with different pmu counters
>   */
> @@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ static int pmu_sbi_get_ctrinfo(int nctr)
>
>  static inline void pmu_sbi_stop_all(struct riscv_pmu *pmu)
>  {
> -       /**
> +       /*
>          * No need to check the error because we are disabling all the counters
>          * which may include counters that are not enabled yet.
>          */
> @@ -494,7 +494,7 @@ static inline void pmu_sbi_stop_hw_ctrs(struct riscv_pmu *pmu)
>                   cpu_hw_evt->used_hw_ctrs[0], 0, 0, 0, 0);
>  }
>
> -/**
> +/*
>   * This function starts all the used counters in two step approach.
>   * Any counter that did not overflow can be start in a single step
>   * while the overflowed counters need to be started with updated initialization
> @@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ static irqreturn_t pmu_sbi_ovf_handler(int irq, void *dev)
>         /* Overflow status register should only be read after counter are stopped */
>         overflow = csr_read(CSR_SSCOUNTOVF);
>
> -       /**
> +       /*
>          * Overflow interrupt pending bit should only be cleared after stopping
>          * all the counters to avoid any race condition.
>          */
> --
> 2.34.1
>

Sorry for the fallout on linux-next. I just realized that these came
in with the BUILD_SUCCESS subject line from lkp for me.
I was filtering those out to a separate folder and missed the
"warning" part in the subject line. I have fixed that.

Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atishp at rivosinc.com>



--
Regards,
Atish