[PATCH -next 3/4] arm64: mm: add support for page table check
Tong Tiangen
tongtiangen at huawei.com
Mon Mar 21 20:07:22 PDT 2022
在 2022/3/22 0:40, Catalin Marinas 写道:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 02:15:36PM +0800, Tong Tiangen wrote:
>> Considering all your suggestions, The final logic should be:
>>
>> +#define pte_user(pte) (!!(pte_val(pte) & PTE_USER))
>>
>> +#define pmd_user(pmd) pte_user(pmd_pte(pmd))
>> +#define pmd_user_exec(pmd) pte_user_exec(pmd_pte(pmd))
>>
>> +#define pud_user(pud) pte_user(pud_pte(pud))
>>
>> +static inline bool pte_user_accessible_page(pte_t pte)
>> +{
>> + return pte_present(pte) && (pte_user(pte)|| pte_user_exec(pte));
>> +}
>
> This is fine.
>
>> +static inline bool pmd_user_accessible_page(pmd_t pmd)
>> +{
>> + return pmd_present(pmd) && (pmd_user(pmd)|| pmd_user_exec(pmd));
>> +}
>
> That's fine as well assuming that the function is only called on the
> set_pmd_at() path where we know that the pmd would be a block mapping
> (huge page). I think that's the case from a quick look at the current
> x86 implementation.
Yeah, PTC only check pmd block mapping(huge page) and pud is similar.
These code logic will be included in V2.
Thanks.
>
>> +static inline bool pud_user_accessible_page(pud_t pud)
>> +{
>> + return pud_present(pud) && pud_user(pud);
>> +}
>
> Same here.
>
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list