[PATCH v4 3/6] RISC-V: Treat IPIs as normal Linux IRQs
Anup Patel
anup at brainfault.org
Tue Mar 1 09:40:55 PST 2022
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 8:07 PM Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 01 Mar 2022 04:27:19 +0000,
> Anup Patel <apatel at ventanamicro.com> wrote:
> >
> > Currently, the RISC-V kernel provides arch specific hooks (i.e.
> > struct riscv_ipi_ops) to register IPI handling methods. The stats
> > gathering of IPIs is also arch specific in the RISC-V kernel.
> >
> > Other architectures (such as ARM, ARM64, and MIPS) have moved away
> > from custom arch specific IPI handling methods. Currently, these
> > architectures have Linux irqchip drivers providing a range of Linux
> > IRQ numbers to be used as IPIs and IPI triggering is done using
> > generic IPI APIs. This approach allows architectures to treat IPIs
> > as normal Linux IRQs and IPI stats gathering is done by the generic
> > Linux IRQ subsystem.
> >
> > We extend the RISC-V IPI handling as-per above approach so that arch
> > specific IPI handling methods (struct riscv_ipi_ops) can be removed
> > and the IPI handling is done through the Linux IRQ subsystem.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel at ventanamicro.com>
> > ---
> > arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 +
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/ipi-mux.h | 43 ++++++
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h | 2 +
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/smp.h | 35 +++--
> > arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile | 1 +
> > arch/riscv/kernel/cpu-hotplug.c | 3 +-
> > arch/riscv/kernel/ipi-mux.c | 222 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/riscv/kernel/irq.c | 3 +-
> > arch/riscv/kernel/sbi.c | 13 +-
> > arch/riscv/kernel/smp.c | 153 ++++++++++----------
> > arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c | 5 +-
> > drivers/clocksource/timer-clint.c | 8 +-
> > drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c | 55 ++++----
> > 13 files changed, 405 insertions(+), 139 deletions(-)
>
> This patch is huge and touches way too many things to be reviewed as
> such. Please split arch-specific stuff from clocksource and irqchip,
> going through a transition phase.
Sure, I will split this patch into smaller patches.
>
> More below.
>
> > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/ipi-mux.h
> > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/ipi-mux.c
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > index 5adcbd9b5e88..167681d6d3f8 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ config RISCV
> > select GENERIC_GETTIMEOFDAY if HAVE_GENERIC_VDSO
> > select GENERIC_IDLE_POLL_SETUP
> > select GENERIC_IOREMAP if MMU
> > + select GENERIC_IRQ_IPI
> > select GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER
> > select GENERIC_IRQ_SHOW
> > select GENERIC_IRQ_SHOW_LEVEL
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/ipi-mux.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/ipi-mux.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..988e2bba372a
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/ipi-mux.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (c) 2022 Ventana Micro Systems Inc.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#ifndef _ASM_RISCV_IPI_MUX_H
> > +#define _ASM_RISCV_IPI_MUX_H
> > +
> > +struct cpumask;
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > +
> > +/* Handle muxed IPIs */
> > +void riscv_ipi_mux_handle_irq(void);
> > +
> > +/* Create irq_domain for muxed IPIs */
> > +struct irq_domain *riscv_ipi_mux_create(bool use_soft_irq,
> > + void (*clear_ipi)(void),
> > + void (*send_ipi)(const struct cpumask *mask));
> > +
> > +/* Destroy irq_domain for muxed IPIs */
> > +void riscv_ipi_mux_destroy(struct irq_domain *d);
> > +
> > +#else
> > +
> > +static inline void riscv_ipi_mux_handle_irq(void)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline struct irq_domain *riscv_ipi_mux_create(bool use_soft_irq,
> > + void (*clear_ipi)(void),
> > + void (*send_ipi)(const struct cpumask *mask))
> > +{
> > + return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void riscv_ipi_mux_destroy(struct irq_domain *d)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +#endif /* _ASM_RISCV_IPI_MUX_H */
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> > index 06133b4f8e20..edd2c3135b4a 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> > @@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ struct sbiret {
> > };
> >
> > void sbi_init(void);
> > +void sbi_ipi_init(void);
> > struct sbiret sbi_ecall(int ext, int fid, unsigned long arg0,
> > unsigned long arg1, unsigned long arg2,
> > unsigned long arg3, unsigned long arg4,
> > @@ -202,6 +203,7 @@ static inline unsigned long sbi_mk_version(unsigned long major,
> > int sbi_err_map_linux_errno(int err);
> > #else /* CONFIG_RISCV_SBI */
> > static inline int sbi_remote_fence_i(const struct cpumask *cpu_mask) { return -1; }
> > +static inline void sbi_ipi_init(void) { }
> > static inline void sbi_init(void) {}
> > #endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_SBI */
> > #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_SBI_H */
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/smp.h
> > index 23170c933d73..178fe4ada592 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/smp.h
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/smp.h
> > @@ -15,11 +15,6 @@
> > struct seq_file;
> > extern unsigned long boot_cpu_hartid;
> >
> > -struct riscv_ipi_ops {
> > - void (*ipi_inject)(const struct cpumask *target);
> > - void (*ipi_clear)(void);
> > -};
> > -
> > #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > /*
> > * Mapping between linux logical cpu index and hartid.
> > @@ -33,9 +28,6 @@ void show_ipi_stats(struct seq_file *p, int prec);
> > /* SMP initialization hook for setup_arch */
> > void __init setup_smp(void);
> >
> > -/* Called from C code, this handles an IPI. */
> > -void handle_IPI(struct pt_regs *regs);
> > -
> > /* Hook for the generic smp_call_function_many() routine. */
> > void arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(struct cpumask *mask);
> >
> > @@ -44,11 +36,17 @@ void arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(int cpu);
> >
> > int riscv_hartid_to_cpuid(int hartid);
> >
> > -/* Set custom IPI operations */
> > -void riscv_set_ipi_ops(const struct riscv_ipi_ops *ops);
> > +/* Enable IPI for CPU hotplug */
> > +void riscv_ipi_enable(void);
> > +
> > +/* Disable IPI for CPU hotplug */
> > +void riscv_ipi_disable(void);
> >
> > -/* Clear IPI for current CPU */
> > -void riscv_clear_ipi(void);
> > +/* Check if IPI interrupt numbers are available */
> > +bool riscv_ipi_have_virq_range(void);
> > +
> > +/* Set the IPI interrupt numbers for arch (called by irqchip drivers) */
> > +void riscv_ipi_set_virq_range(int virq, int nr_irqs);
> >
> > /* Secondary hart entry */
> > asmlinkage void smp_callin(void);
> > @@ -82,11 +80,20 @@ static inline unsigned long cpuid_to_hartid_map(int cpu)
> > return boot_cpu_hartid;
> > }
> >
> > -static inline void riscv_set_ipi_ops(const struct riscv_ipi_ops *ops)
> > +static inline void riscv_ipi_enable(void)
> > {
> > }
> >
> > -static inline void riscv_clear_ipi(void)
> > +static inline void riscv_ipi_disable(void)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline bool riscv_ipi_have_virq_range(void)
> > +{
> > + return false;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void riscv_ipi_set_virq_range(int virq, int nr)
> > {
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
> > index ffc87e76b1dd..5047723e5527 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
> > @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_M_MODE) += traps_misaligned.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_FPU) += fpu.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += smpboot.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += smp.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += ipi-mux.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += cpu_ops.o
> >
> > obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_BOOT_SPINWAIT) += cpu_ops_spinwait.o
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu-hotplug.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu-hotplug.c
> > index f7a832e3a1d1..39235cf50652 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu-hotplug.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu-hotplug.c
> > @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
> > #include <asm/irq.h>
> > #include <asm/cpu_ops.h>
> > #include <asm/numa.h>
> > -#include <asm/sbi.h>
> > +#include <asm/smp.h>
> >
> > bool cpu_has_hotplug(unsigned int cpu)
> > {
> > @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ int __cpu_disable(void)
> > remove_cpu_topology(cpu);
> > numa_remove_cpu(cpu);
> > set_cpu_online(cpu, false);
> > + riscv_ipi_disable();
> > irq_migrate_all_off_this_cpu();
> >
> > return ret;
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/ipi-mux.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/ipi-mux.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..3a0405f0e0de
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/ipi-mux.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,222 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > +/*
> > + * Multiplex several IPIs over a single HW IPI.
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (c) 2022 Ventana Micro Systems Inc.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "riscv-ipi-mux: " fmt
> > +#include <linux/cpu.h>
> > +#include <linux/cpumask.h>
> > +#include <linux/init.h>
> > +#include <linux/irq.h>
> > +#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> > +#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
> > +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> > +#include <linux/smp.h>
> > +#include <asm/ipi-mux.h>
> > +
> > +struct ipi_mux {
> > + struct irq_domain *domain;
> > + int parent_virq;
> > + void (*clear_ipi)(void);
> > + void (*send_ipi)(const struct cpumask *mask);
> > +};
>
> Why do you need this in the arch code? It really looks like something
> that is irqchip specific (single IPI signal on which actual IPIs are
> overlayed). It is also something that other irqchips are already
> implementing, so there is potential for consolidation.
I agree we can share the IPI muxing among irqchip drivers.
I was not sure where to place this IPI muxing so I made it
RISC-V specific initially.
Can we place a simplified IPI muxing (with no RISC-V specific
stuff) under drivers/irqchip or kernel/irq ??
>
> > +
> > +static struct ipi_mux ipi_mux_priv;
> > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, ipi_mux_bits);
> > +
> > +static void ipi_mux_dummy(struct irq_data *d)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void ipi_mux_send_mask(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask)
> > +{
> > + int cpu;
> > +
> > + /* Barrier before doing atomic bit update to IPI bits */
> > + smp_mb__before_atomic();
> > +
> > + for_each_cpu(cpu, mask)
> > + set_bit(d->hwirq, per_cpu_ptr(&ipi_mux_bits, cpu));
> > +
> > + /* Barrier after doing atomic bit update to IPI bits */
> > + smp_mb__after_atomic();
> > +
> > + if (ipi_mux_priv.send_ipi)
> > + ipi_mux_priv.send_ipi(mask);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct irq_chip ipi_mux_chip = {
> > + .name = "RISC-V IPI Mux",
> > + .irq_mask = ipi_mux_dummy,
> > + .irq_unmask = ipi_mux_dummy,
> > + .ipi_send_mask = ipi_mux_send_mask,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int ipi_mux_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
> > + irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
> > +{
> > + irq_set_percpu_devid(irq);
> > + irq_domain_set_info(d, irq, hwirq, &ipi_mux_chip, d->host_data,
> > + handle_percpu_devid_irq, NULL, NULL);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ipi_mux_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
> > + unsigned int nr_irqs, void *arg)
> > +{
> > + int i, ret;
> > + irq_hw_number_t hwirq;
> > + unsigned int type = IRQ_TYPE_NONE;
> > + struct irq_fwspec *fwspec = arg;
> > +
> > + ret = irq_domain_translate_onecell(d, fwspec, &hwirq, &type);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++) {
> > + ret = ipi_mux_domain_map(d, virq + i, hwirq + i);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct irq_domain_ops ipi_mux_domain_ops = {
> > + .translate = irq_domain_translate_onecell,
> > + .alloc = ipi_mux_domain_alloc,
> > + .free = irq_domain_free_irqs_top,
> > +};
> > +
> > +void riscv_ipi_mux_handle_irq(void)
> > +{
> > + int err;
> > + unsigned long irqs, *bits = this_cpu_ptr(&ipi_mux_bits);
> > + irq_hw_number_t hwirq;
> > +
> > + while (true) {
> > + if (ipi_mux_priv.clear_ipi)
> > + ipi_mux_priv.clear_ipi();
> > +
> > + /* Order bit clearing and data access. */
> > + mb();
> > +
> > + irqs = xchg(bits, 0);
> > + if (!irqs)
> > + break;
> > +
> > + for_each_set_bit(hwirq, &irqs, BITS_PER_LONG) {
> > + err = generic_handle_domain_irq(ipi_mux_priv.domain,
> > + hwirq);
> > + if (unlikely(err))
> > + pr_warn_ratelimited(
> > + "can't find mapping for hwirq %lu\n",
> > + hwirq);
> > + }
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void ipi_mux_handle_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
> > +{
> > + struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> > +
> > + chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> > + riscv_ipi_mux_handle_irq();
> > + chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ipi_mux_dying_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> > +{
> > + if (ipi_mux_priv.parent_virq)
> > + disable_percpu_irq(ipi_mux_priv.parent_virq);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ipi_mux_starting_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> > +{
> > + if (ipi_mux_priv.parent_virq)
> > + enable_percpu_irq(ipi_mux_priv.parent_virq,
> > + irq_get_trigger_type(ipi_mux_priv.parent_virq));
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +struct irq_domain *riscv_ipi_mux_create(bool use_soft_irq,
> > + void (*clear_ipi)(void),
> > + void (*send_ipi)(const struct cpumask *mask))
> > +{
>
> There really shouldn't be a need for such a registration interface
> anyway (the current idiom is to allocate IPIs in the root irqchip, and
> pass them to the arch code).
>
> Why can't you model it after the existing architectures?
I ended up with a lot of duplicate code between SBI IPI driver and
SiFive CLINT driver so I factored out the IPI muxing as separate
sources. We also have RISC-V AIA drivers using the same IPI muxing.
If we simplify the IPI muxing and move it out of arch/riscv then
changes in this patch are straight forward to review.
>
> > + int virq, parent_virq = 0;
> > + struct irq_domain *domain;
> > + struct irq_fwspec ipi;
> > +
> > + if (ipi_mux_priv.domain || riscv_ipi_have_virq_range())
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + if (use_soft_irq) {
> > + domain = irq_find_matching_fwnode(riscv_get_intc_hwnode(),
> > + DOMAIN_BUS_ANY);
> > + if (!domain) {
> > + pr_err("unable to find INTC IRQ domain\n");
> > + return NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + parent_virq = irq_create_mapping(domain, RV_IRQ_SOFT);
> > + if (!parent_virq) {
> > + pr_err("unable to create INTC IRQ mapping\n");
> > + return NULL;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + domain = irq_domain_add_linear(NULL, BITS_PER_LONG,
> > + &ipi_mux_domain_ops, NULL);
> > + if (!domain) {
> > + pr_err("unable to add IPI Mux domain\n");
> > + goto fail_dispose_mapping;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ipi.fwnode = domain->fwnode;
> > + ipi.param_count = 1;
> > + ipi.param[0] = 0;
> > + virq = __irq_domain_alloc_irqs(domain, -1, BITS_PER_LONG,
> > + NUMA_NO_NODE, &ipi, false, NULL);
> > + if (virq <= 0) {
> > + pr_err("unable to alloc IRQs from IPI Mux domain\n");
> > + goto fail_domain_remove;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ipi_mux_priv.domain = domain;
> > + ipi_mux_priv.parent_virq = parent_virq;
> > + ipi_mux_priv.clear_ipi = clear_ipi;
> > + ipi_mux_priv.send_ipi = send_ipi;
> > +
> > + if (parent_virq)
> > + irq_set_chained_handler(parent_virq, ipi_mux_handle_irq);
> > +
> > + cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN,
> > + "irqchip/riscv/ipi-mux:starting",
> > + ipi_mux_starting_cpu, ipi_mux_dying_cpu);
> > +
> > + riscv_ipi_set_virq_range(virq, BITS_PER_LONG);
> > +
> > + return ipi_mux_priv.domain;
> > +
> > +fail_domain_remove:
> > + irq_domain_remove(domain);
> > +fail_dispose_mapping:
> > + if (parent_virq)
> > + irq_dispose_mapping(parent_virq);
> > + return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void riscv_ipi_mux_destroy(struct irq_domain *d)
> > +{
> > + if (!d || ipi_mux_priv.domain != d)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + irq_domain_remove(ipi_mux_priv.domain);
> > + if (ipi_mux_priv.parent_virq)
> > + irq_dispose_mapping(ipi_mux_priv.parent_virq);
> > + memset(&ipi_mux_priv, 0, sizeof(ipi_mux_priv));
> > +}
>
> Err... Under which circumstances do you destroy such an irqdomain?
> Once all the CPUs have been removed from the machine?
In case, there was a failure after creating an IPI muxing domain then
this function allows us to destroy the IPI muxing domain.
>
> I really think you should aim for a simpler abstraction. The arch code
> should deal with the interrupts themselves, and leave the
> *implementation* of the IPI to the driver code, potentially shared
> across irqchips. This would avoid creating more new interfaces that
> are specific to one architecture or another.
I agree.
>
> M.
>
> --
> Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Regards,
Anup
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list