[PATCH v4 1/1] RISC-V: Create unique identification for SoC PMU
Anup Patel
apatel at ventanamicro.com
Tue Jun 21 00:51:11 PDT 2022
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 1:13 PM Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin at maquefel.me> wrote:
>
> Hello Anup!
>
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 12:40:20 -0700
> Atish Patra <atishp at atishpatra.org> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 7:40 AM Nikita Shubin
> > <nikita.shubin at maquefel.me> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 17:30:58 +0530
> > > Anup Patel <apatel at ventanamicro.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 4:41 PM Nikita Shubin
> > > > <nikita.shubin at maquefel.me> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Nikita Shubin <n.shubin at yadro.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Provide RISC-V SBI PMU id to distinguish different cores or
> > > > > SoCs via "devices/platform/riscv-pmu/id" sysfs entry.
> > > > >
> > > > > The identification is generated as string of marchid, mimpid,
> > > > > mvendorid in hex format separated by coma -
> > > > > "0x70032,0x70032,0x0".
> > > > >
> > > > > The CSRs are detailed in the RISC-V privileged spec [1].
> > > > > [1] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual
> > > > >
> > > > > Inspired-by: João Mário Domingos <joao.mario at tecnico.ulisboa.pt>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Nikita Shubin <n.shubin at yadro.com>
> > > >
> > > > The mvendorid, marchid, and mimpid can be useful to apps other
> > > > than perf tool.
> > > >
> > > > I have tried to extend /proc/cpuinfo with this information which
> > > > can be parsed by perf tool:
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220620115549.1529597-1-apatel@ventanamicro.com/
> > > >
> > >
> > > Atish, what do you think about this ?
> > >
> > > RISC-V perf can rely on "/proc/cpuinfo", in some similar manner like
> > > "tools/perf/arch/s390/util/header.c" does.
> > >
> >
> > Yes. We can expose these three values either in sysfs or procfs
> > (/proc/cpuinfo). For perf tool, it shouldn't matter as the header.c
> > will need to generate the unique cpuid
> > string from either.
> >
> > I am not sure if any other userspace tool prefers to parse sysfs
> > instead of cpuinfo.
>
> Okay - let's stick to /proc/cpuinfo.
Sounds good.
You might have to write /proc/cpuinfo parsing code in perf tool
header.c. Do you plan to send v4 of perf tool patches ??
Regards,
Anup
>
> >
> > > Can it create problems with pmu identification in case of
> > > hetergenous harts ?
> > >
> >
> > Does perf support hetergenous harts at all ? ARM64 code
> > (tool/perf/arch/arm64/util/header.c)
> > just breaks out of the loop after finding the first MIDR.
> >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Anup
> > > >
> > > > > ---
> > > > > v3->v4:
> > > > > - use string for pmuid
> > > > > - rename pmu_sbi_id_show to id_show
> > > > > - fix error print message in id_show
> > > > > - fix DEVICE_ATTR to use octal permissions
> > > > > ---
> > > > > arch/riscv/kernel/sbi.c | 3 +++
> > > > > drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c | 41
> > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 45
> > > > > insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/sbi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/sbi.c
> > > > > index 775d3322b422..50dd9b6ecc9e 100644
> > > > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/sbi.c
> > > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/sbi.c
> > > > > @@ -627,16 +627,19 @@ long sbi_get_mvendorid(void)
> > > > > {
> > > > > return __sbi_base_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_MVENDORID);
> > > > > }
> > > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(sbi_get_mvendorid);
> > > > >
> > > > > long sbi_get_marchid(void)
> > > > > {
> > > > > return __sbi_base_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_MARCHID);
> > > > > }
> > > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(sbi_get_marchid);
> > > > >
> > > > > long sbi_get_mimpid(void)
> > > > > {
> > > > > return __sbi_base_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_MIMPID);
> > > > > }
> > > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(sbi_get_mimpid);
> > > > >
> > > > > static void sbi_send_cpumask_ipi(const struct cpumask *target)
> > > > > {
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> > > > > b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c index dca3537a8dcc..be812f855617
> > > > > 100644 --- a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> > > > > @@ -693,6 +693,28 @@ static int pmu_sbi_setup_irqs(struct
> > > > > riscv_pmu *pmu, struct platform_device *pde return 0;
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > +static ssize_t id_show(struct device *dev,
> > > > > + struct device_attribute *attr,
> > > > > char *buf) +{
> > > > > + int len;
> > > > > + struct riscv_pmu *pmu =
> > > > > container_of(dev_get_drvdata(dev), struct riscv_pmu, pmu); +
> > > > > + len = sprintf(buf, "%s\n", pmu->pmuid);
> > > > > + if (len <= 0)
> > > > > + dev_err(dev, "invalid sprintf len: %d\n", len);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + return len;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static DEVICE_ATTR(id, 0644, id_show, NULL);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static struct attribute *pmu_sbi_attrs[] = {
> > > > > + &dev_attr_id.attr,
> > > > > + NULL
> > > > > +};
> > > > > +
> > > > > +ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(pmu_sbi);
> > > > > +
> > > > > static int pmu_sbi_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > > {
> > > > > struct riscv_pmu *pmu = NULL;
> > > > > @@ -714,6 +736,14 @@ static int pmu_sbi_device_probe(struct
> > > > > platform_device *pdev) if (pmu_sbi_get_ctrinfo(num_counters))
> > > > > goto out_free;
> > > > >
> > > > > + /* fill pmuid */
> > > > > + pmu->pmuid = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "0x%lx,0x%lx,0x%lx",
> > > > > + sbi_get_marchid(),
> > > > > + sbi_get_mimpid(),
> > > > > + sbi_get_mvendorid());
> > > > > + if (!pmu->pmuid)
> > > > > + goto out_free_pmuid;
> > > > > +
> > > > > ret = pmu_sbi_setup_irqs(pmu, pdev);
> > > > > if (ret < 0) {
> > > > > pr_info("Perf sampling/filtering is not
> > > > > supported as sscof extension is not available\n"); @@ -739,8
> > > > > +769,19 @@ static int pmu_sbi_device_probe(struct
> > > > > platform_device *pdev) return ret; }
> > > > >
> > > > > + ret = sysfs_create_group(&pdev->dev.kobj,
> > > > > &pmu_sbi_group);
> > > > > + if (ret) {
> > > > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "sysfs creation failed\n");
> > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > + pdev->dev.groups = pmu_sbi_groups;
> > > > > + dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, pmu);
> > > > > +
> > > > > return 0;
> > > > >
> > > > > +out_free_pmuid:
> > > > > + kfree(pmu->pmuid);
> > > > > out_free:
> > > > > kfree(pmu);
> > > > > return ret;
> > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h
> > > > > b/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h index
> > > > > 46f9b6fe306e..cf3557b77fb8 100644 ---
> > > > > a/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h +++
> > > > > b/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ struct
> > > > > cpu_hw_events { struct riscv_pmu {
> > > > > struct pmu pmu;
> > > > > char *name;
> > > > > + char *pmuid;
> > > > >
> > > > > irqreturn_t (*handle_irq)(int irq_num, void *dev);
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.35.1
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list