[PATCH v4 1/1] MAINTAINERS: add polarfire rng, pci and clock drivers
Conor.Dooley at microchip.com
Conor.Dooley at microchip.com
Thu Jun 9 15:53:07 PDT 2022
On 09/06/2022 23:43, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Palmer Dabbelt (2022-06-01 18:55:40)
>> On Mon, 23 May 2022 13:00:01 PDT (-0700), Conor.Dooley at microchip.com wrote:
>>> On 23/05/2022 20:52, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 23 May 2022 04:42:53 PDT (-0700), Conor.Dooley at microchip.com wrote:
>>>>> On 05/05/2022 11:55, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>>>>> Hardware random, PCI and clock drivers for the PolarFire SoC have been
>>>>>> upstreamed but are not covered by the MAINTAINERS entry, so add them.
>>>>>> Daire is the author of the clock & PCI drivers, so add him as a
>>>>>> maintainer in place of Lewis.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey Palmer,
>>>>> I know youre busy etc but just a reminder :)
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, I didn't realize this was aimed at the RISC-V tree.�� I'm fine
>>>> taking it, but it seems like these should have gone in along with the
>>>> drivers.
>>>
>>> Yeah, sorry. In hindsight it should've but that ship has sailed. I sent
>>> the rng bundled this way b/c I didn't want to end up a conflict.
>>> Obv. there's not a rush so I can always split it back out if needs be.
>>
>> I'm adding a bunch of subsystem maintainers just to check again. I
>> don't have any problem with it, just not really a RISC-V thing and don't
>> wan to make a mess. I've stashed it over at palmer/pcsoc-maintainers
>> for now.
>>
>
> Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd at kernel.org>
>
+CC Herbert for the last one.
This is likely to generate a conflict in -next though b/c
my spi driver that was applied for 5.20 also touches this
entry. It really pisses me off that I allowed this to
happen & become a burden..
What am I "meant" to do here? Do the merges myself & provide
the conflict resolution? Or for something as obvious as this
is it enough to notify that there will be one?
Sorry,
Conor.
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list