(RISC-V KVM) Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: fix typos in comments

[Anup Patel]

On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 9:56 AM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at dabbelt.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 12:11:20 PDT (-0700), Julia.Lawall at inria.fr wrote:
> > Various spelling mistakes in comments.
> > Detected with the help of Coccinelle.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall at inria.fr>
> >
> > ---
> >  arch/riscv/kvm/vmid.c |    2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vmid.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vmid.c
> > index 2fa4f7b1813d..4a2178c60b5d 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vmid.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vmid.c
> > @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ void kvm_riscv_stage2_vmid_update(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >                * We ran out of VMIDs so we increment vmid_version and
> >                * start assigning VMIDs from 1.
> >                *
> > -              * This also means existing VMIDs assignement to all Guest
> > +              * This also means existing VMIDs assignment to all Guest
> >                * instances is invalid and we have force VMID re-assignement
> >                * for all Guest instances. The Guest instances that were not
> >                * running will automatically pick-up new VMIDs because will
>
> Anup: I'm guessing you didn't see this because it didn't have KVM in the
> subject?
>
> Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at rivosinc.com>
> Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at rivosinc.com>
>
> if that helps any, I don't see in anywhere but not sure if I'm just
> missing it.

Thanks Palmer, I had already planned to pick this as a RC fix for 5.19
but I forgot to reply here.

Regards,
Anup