[PATCH v5 00/10] PolarFire SoC dt for 5.19

Conor.Dooley at microchip.com Conor.Dooley at microchip.com
Wed Jun 1 21:39:34 PDT 2022


On 02/06/2022 03:07, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On Mon, 23 May 2022 04:47:55 PDT (-0700), Conor.Dooley at microchip.com wrote:
>> On 09/05/2022 15:26, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>> Hey all,
>>> Got a few PolarFire SoC device tree related changes here for 5.19.
>>
>> Hey Palmer,
>> I know you're busy etc but I had been hoping you'd take this for
>> 5.19. I know it's late, so nw if it's too late.
> 
> It wasn't too late for me, this is on for-next.  Thanks!

Thanks

> 
>> Thanks,
>> Conor.
>>
>>>
>>> Firstly, patches 1 & 2 of this series supersede [0] & are unchanged
>>> compared to that submission, figured it would just be easier to keep
>>> all the changes in one series.
>>>
>>> As discussed on irc, patch 3 removes the duplicated "microchip" from
>>> the device tree files so that they follow a soc-board.dts & a
>>> soc{,-fabric}.dtsi format.
>>>
>>> Patch 5 makes the fabric dtsi board specific by renaming the file to
>>> mpfs-icicle-kit-fabric.dtsi & including it in the dts rather than
>>> mpfs.dtsi. Additionally this will allow other boards to define their
>>> own reference fabric design. A revision specific compatible, added in
>>> patch 4, is added to the dt also.
>>>
>>> The remainder of the series adds a bare minimum devicetree for the
>>> Sundance Polarberry.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Conor.
>>>
>>> Changes since v4:
>>> - Whitespace and status ordering changes in the polarberry dt pointed
>>>    out by Heiko
>>> - A new patch for same whitspace and status order changes, but applied
>>>    to the icicle dt
>>> - A reordering of the icicle dt alphabetically to match the formatting
>>>    of the polarberry dt
>>>
>>> Changes since v3:
>>> - remove an extra line of wshitespace added to dt-binding
>>> - remove unneeded "okay" status & sort status to node end
>>> - sort polarberry dts entries in ~alphabetical order
>>> - add a comment explaining why the second mac (mac0) is disabled on
>>>    polarberry
>>>
>>> Changes since v2:
>>> - make ,icicle-reference compatible with ,mpfs & put it inside the enum
>>>
>>> Changes since v1:
>>> - fixed whitespace problems in the polarberry dts
>>> - disabled mac0 for the polarberry as its port is on the optional
>>>    carrier board
>>>
>>> Conor Dooley (10):
>>>    riscv: dts: microchip: remove icicle memory clocks
>>>    riscv: dts: microchip: move sysctrlr out of soc bus
>>>    riscv: dts: microchip: remove soc vendor from filenames
>>>    dt-bindings: riscv: microchip: document icicle reference design
>>>    riscv: dts: microchip: make the fabric dtsi board specific
>>>    dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: add Sundance DSP
>>>    dt-bindings: riscv: microchip: add polarberry compatible string
>>>    riscv: dts: microchip: add the sundance polarberry
>>>    riscv: microchip: icicle: readability fixes
>>>    riscv: dts: icicle: sort nodes alphabetically
>>>
>>>   .../devicetree/bindings/riscv/microchip.yaml  |   2 +
>>>   .../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml  |   2 +
>>>   arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/Makefile        |   3 +-
>>>   ...abric.dtsi => mpfs-icicle-kit-fabric.dtsi} |   2 +
>>>   ...pfs-icicle-kit.dts => mpfs-icicle-kit.dts} | 105 +++++++++---------
>>>   .../dts/microchip/mpfs-polarberry-fabric.dtsi |  16 +++
>>>   .../boot/dts/microchip/mpfs-polarberry.dts    |  99 +++++++++++++++++
>>>   .../{microchip-mpfs.dtsi => mpfs.dtsi}        |  11 +-
>>>   8 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>>>   rename arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/{microchip-mpfs-fabric.dtsi => mpfs-icicle-kit-fabric.dtsi} (91%)
>>>   rename arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/{microchip-mpfs-icicle-kit.dts => mpfs-icicle-kit.dts} (95%)
>>>   create mode 100644 arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs-polarberry-fabric.dtsi
>>>   create mode 100644 arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs-polarberry.dts
>>>   rename arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/{microchip-mpfs.dtsi => mpfs.dtsi} (98%)
>>>
>>



More information about the linux-riscv mailing list