[PATCH] dt-bindings: Improve phandle-array schemas

Krzysztof Kozlowski krzysztof.kozlowski at canonical.com
Tue Jan 18 23:40:48 PST 2022


On 19/01/2022 02:50, Rob Herring wrote:
> The 'phandle-array' type is a bit ambiguous. It can be either just an
> array of phandles or an array of phandles plus args. Many schemas for
> phandle-array properties aren't clear in the schema which case applies
> though the description usually describes it.
> 
> The array of phandles case boils down to needing:
> 
> items:
>   maxItems: 1
> 
> The phandle plus args cases should typically take this form:
> 
> items:
>   - items:
>       - description: A phandle
>       - description: 1st arg cell
>       - description: 2nd arg cell
> 
> With this change, some examples need updating so that the bracketing of
> property values matches the schema.
> 

Samsung and memory controller bits look good:

Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski at canonical.com>


Best regards,
Krzysztof



More information about the linux-riscv mailing list