[PATCH] dt-bindings: Improve phandle-array schemas
Krzysztof Kozlowski
krzysztof.kozlowski at canonical.com
Tue Jan 18 23:40:48 PST 2022
On 19/01/2022 02:50, Rob Herring wrote:
> The 'phandle-array' type is a bit ambiguous. It can be either just an
> array of phandles or an array of phandles plus args. Many schemas for
> phandle-array properties aren't clear in the schema which case applies
> though the description usually describes it.
>
> The array of phandles case boils down to needing:
>
> items:
> maxItems: 1
>
> The phandle plus args cases should typically take this form:
>
> items:
> - items:
> - description: A phandle
> - description: 1st arg cell
> - description: 2nd arg cell
>
> With this change, some examples need updating so that the bracketing of
> property values matches the schema.
>
Samsung and memory controller bits look good:
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski at canonical.com>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list