[RFC 01/32] Kconfig: introduce and depend on LEGACY_PCI
John Garry
john.garry at huawei.com
Fri Jan 7 09:16:23 PST 2022
On 06/01/2022 18:14, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> That driver would prob not be used on systems which does not support PIO,
>> and so could have a HAS_IOPORT dependency. But it is not strictly necessary.
> I don't want the path of "this driver isn't needed because the device
> is unlikely to be used on this arch."
Sure, that was just a one off example. As I mentioned before, I think
that Arnd already did most of the ifdeffery work, but it was not
included in this series.
>
> Maybe it's not_always_ possible, but if the device can be plugged
> into the platform, I think we should be able to build the driver for
> it.
>
> If the device requires I/O port space and the platform doesn't support
> it, the PCI core or the driver should detect that and give a useful
> diagnostic.
>
I'm not sure what the driver can say apart from -ENODEV. Or IO port
management in resource.c could warn for requesting IO port region when
it's unsupported.
Anyway, this same conversion was had with Linus before I got involved.
If you think it is worth discussing again then I suppose the authors
here need to gain consensus.
Thanks,
John
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list