[PATCH v7 05/11] dt-bindings: pwm: add microchip corepwm binding
conor.dooley at microchip.com
conor.dooley at microchip.com
Wed Feb 23 00:55:10 PST 2022
On 23/02/2022 08:20, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 08:12:49AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 23/02/2022 07:20, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 01:58:35PM +0000, conor.dooley at microchip.com wrote:
> > >> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
> > >>
> > >> Add device tree bindings for the Microchip fpga fabric based "core" PWM
> > >> controller.
> > >>
> > >> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
> > >> Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at rivosinc.com>
> > >
> > > I like it:
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de>
> > >
> > > nitpick: Put your S-o-b last in the commit log. (This doesn't justify a
> > > resend IMHO)
> >
> > It should be the opposite - the first. First author signs the patch,
> > then comes review and finally an ack. Putting SoB at then suggests that
> > tags were accumulated before sending patch, out of mailing list.
>
> well, or in an earlier revision of this patch as is the case here. One
> of the ideas of S-o-b is that the order shows the flow of the patch
> states and if this patch ends in git with:
>
> Referred-by: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
> Singed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
> Backed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at rivosinc.com>
> Singed-off-by: Peter Maintainer <pm at example.com>
>
> I'd expect that Backed-by was added by Peter, not Conor.
> (Modified the tags on purpose to not interfere with b4's tag pickup, I
> guess you humans still get the point.)
I had put the acks after the S-o-B for patches I hadn't changed since the ack,
but I think that may have been a misinterpretation of what was meant by Rob
when he said tags should be in chronological order. Won't do it this way in
the future.
If the remaining patch gets a maintainer ack, the order will be fine I guess
since it'll be Palmer taking it anyway. If there's a v8, I will fix the order.
Thanks,
Conor
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list