[RFC PATCH 01/37] KVM: x86/mmu: Store the address space ID directly in kvm_mmu_page_role
Sean Christopherson
seanjc at google.com
Wed Dec 14 11:42:30 PST 2022
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 1:47 AM Sean Christopherson <seanjc at google.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > My preference would be to leave .smm in x86's page role. IMO, defining multiple
> > address spaces to support SMM emulation was a mistake that should be contained to
> > SMM, i.e. should never be used for any other feature. And with CONFIG_KVM_SMM,
> > even x86 can opt out.
> >
>
>
> I think the name ASID in kvm/x86 should be used for vmcb's ASID,
> vmcs's VPID, and PCID. Using the name ASID for other purposes
> would only result in unnecessary confusion.
I agree in principle, but at this point fixing the problem would require a lot of
churn since "as_id" is pervasive throughout the memslots code.
It should be possible though, as I don't think anything in KVM's uAPI explicitly
takes an as_id, i.e. it's KVM-internal terminology for the most part.
> There is a bug for shadow paging when it uses two separate sets
> of memslots which are using two sets of rmap and page-tracking.
>
> When SMM world is writing to a non-SMM page which happens to be
> a guest pagetable in the non-SMM world, the write operation will
> go smoothly without specially handled and the shadow page for the guest
> pagetable is neither unshadowed nor marked unsync. The shadow paging
> code is unaware that the shadow page has deviated from the guest
> pagetable.
Won't the unsync code work as intended? for_each_gfn_valid_sp_with_gptes()
doesn't consume the slot and I don't see any explicit filtering on role.smm,
i.e. should unsync all SPTEs for the gfn.
Addressing the page-track case is a bit gross, but doesn't appear to be too
difficult. I wouldn't be surprised if there are other SMM => non-SMM bugs lurking
though.
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 7 +++---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h | 3 ++-
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++--------
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c | 2 +-
5 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
index eb186bc57f6a..fdd9de31e160 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ void kvm_slot_page_track_add_page(struct kvm *kvm,
void kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page(struct kvm *kvm,
struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
enum kvm_page_track_mode mode);
-bool kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(struct kvm *kvm,
+bool kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
gfn_t gfn, enum kvm_page_track_mode mode);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 254bc46234e0..1c2200042133 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -2715,9 +2715,10 @@ static void kvm_unsync_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
* were marked unsync (or if there is no shadow page), -EPERM if the SPTE must
* be write-protected.
*/
-int mmu_try_to_unsync_pages(struct kvm *kvm, const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+int mmu_try_to_unsync_pages(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
gfn_t gfn, bool can_unsync, bool prefetch)
{
+ struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
bool locked = false;
@@ -2726,7 +2727,7 @@ int mmu_try_to_unsync_pages(struct kvm *kvm, const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
* track machinery is used to write-protect upper-level shadow pages,
* i.e. this guards the role.level == 4K assertion below!
*/
- if (kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(kvm, slot, gfn, KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE))
+ if (kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(vcpu, slot, gfn, KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE))
return -EPERM;
/*
@@ -4127,7 +4128,7 @@ static bool page_fault_handle_page_track(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
* guest is writing the page which is write tracked which can
* not be fixed by page fault handler.
*/
- if (kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(vcpu->kvm, fault->slot, fault->gfn, KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE))
+ if (kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(vcpu, fault->slot, fault->gfn, KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE))
return true;
return false;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
index ac00bfbf32f6..38040ab27986 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
@@ -156,7 +156,8 @@ static inline bool kvm_mmu_page_ad_need_write_protect(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
return kvm_x86_ops.cpu_dirty_log_size && sp->role.guest_mode;
}
-int mmu_try_to_unsync_pages(struct kvm *kvm, const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+int mmu_try_to_unsync_pages(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
gfn_t gfn, bool can_unsync, bool prefetch);
void kvm_mmu_gfn_disallow_lpage(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c
index 2e09d1b6249f..0e9bc837257e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#include "mmu.h"
#include "mmu_internal.h"
+#include "smm.h"
bool kvm_page_track_write_tracking_enabled(struct kvm *kvm)
{
@@ -171,27 +172,40 @@ void kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page(struct kvm *kvm,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page);
+static bool __kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+ gfn_t gfn, enum kvm_page_track_mode mode)
+{
+ int index;
+
+ if (!slot)
+ return false;
+
+ index = gfn_to_index(gfn, slot->base_gfn, PG_LEVEL_4K);
+ return !!READ_ONCE(slot->arch.gfn_track[mode][index]);
+}
+
/*
* check if the corresponding access on the specified guest page is tracked.
*/
-bool kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(struct kvm *kvm,
+bool kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
gfn_t gfn, enum kvm_page_track_mode mode)
{
- int index;
-
if (WARN_ON(!page_track_mode_is_valid(mode)))
return false;
- if (!slot)
- return false;
-
if (mode == KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE &&
- !kvm_page_track_write_tracking_enabled(kvm))
+ !kvm_page_track_write_tracking_enabled(vcpu->kvm))
return false;
- index = gfn_to_index(gfn, slot->base_gfn, PG_LEVEL_4K);
- return !!READ_ONCE(slot->arch.gfn_track[mode][index]);
+ if (__kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(slot, gfn, mode))
+ return true;
+
+ if (!is_smm(vcpu))
+ return false;
+
+ return __kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(gfn_to_memslot(vcpu->kvm, gfn),
+ gfn, mode);
}
void kvm_page_track_cleanup(struct kvm *kvm)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
index c0fd7e049b4e..89ddd113c1b9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ bool make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
* e.g. it's write-tracked (upper-level SPs) or has one or more
* shadow pages and unsync'ing pages is not allowed.
*/
- if (mmu_try_to_unsync_pages(vcpu->kvm, slot, gfn, can_unsync, prefetch)) {
+ if (mmu_try_to_unsync_pages(vcpu, slot, gfn, can_unsync, prefetch)) {
pgprintk("%s: found shadow page for %llx, marking ro\n",
__func__, gfn);
wrprot = true;
base-commit: e0ef1f14e97ff65adf6e2157952dbbd1e482065c
--
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list