[PATCH v3 0/9] More PolarFire SoC Fixes for 5.18

Palmer Dabbelt palmer at rivosinc.com
Fri Apr 22 12:39:18 PDT 2022


On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 00:58:27 PDT (-0700), conor.dooley at microchip.com wrote:
> Hey all,
> After the clock driver for the PolarFire SoC was accepted I started work
> on the onboard RTC & found out that the reference clock for the rtc was
> actually missing from the clock driver.
>
> While restructuring the clock driver to add support for the rtc
> reference, I also noticed that there were some problems with how the FIC
> clocks were being used. The FIC clocks are the cpu side inputs to the
> AXI fabric interconnections & are not the clocks for any peripherals.
>
> This first three patches in this series fixes the problems with the FICs:
> - the fic clocks incorrectly had the AHB clock as their parents
> - the last fic, named differently to the others, had not been set as
>   a critical clock
> - some peripherals on the fabric side were incorrectly using the cpu
>   side fic clocks, resulting in incorrect rates.
>
> The second part of the series fixes the missing rtc reference clock.
> There are three main changes:
> - Changing the reference clock in the dt to the external 125 MHz
>   oscillator rather than using the output of an internal pll. This has
>   the added benefit of not requiring changes to the device tree if this
>   part of the bitstream changes.
> - Adding a new clock into the driver that sits above the existing
>   configurable clocks & has the external reference as a parent. The new
>   clock provides the parent for the AHB/AXI clocks which formerly came
>   from the device tree.
> - Adding the rtc reference clock to the dt bindings, device tree and
>   clock driver at the configurable clock level, alongside AXI and AHB.
>
> I kept series separate from [0] since that's tied to the CONFIG_PM stuff
> & fixes a specific problem.
>
> Changes since v1:
> After speaking with Krzysztof, I have merged the rtc reference changes
> [1] with these fixes for 5.18. This was done since the relevant drivers
> and bindings only arrived in v5.18 & there'll now be no issue with
> breaking the ABI.
> Backwards compatiblity with the device tree from before 5.18 will be
> broken by these changes, but the board did not boot then anyway... If
> that is not okay, please lmk.
>
> The patch renaming sys_base was dropped since that's not a fix.
>
> Version 1 would not apply without [0] & that should be fixed too.
>
> Thanks,
> Conor.
>
> Changes since v2:
> - Wrapped text in dt-binding changes at 80 cols
> - Ordered the clock defines numerically in the binding header
> - Fixed the Fixes tag on the last patch and added the second tag
>
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20220408143646.3693104-1-conor.dooley@microchip.com
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20220411072340.740981-1-conor.dooley@microchip.com
>
> Conor Dooley (9):
>   clk: microchip: mpfs: fix parents for FIC clocks
>   clk: microchip: mpfs: mark CLK_ATHENA as critical
>   riscv: dts: microchip: fix usage of fic clocks on mpfs
>   dt-bindings: clk: mpfs document msspll dri registers
>   dt-bindings: clk: mpfs: add defines for two new clocks
>   dt-bindings: rtc: add refclk to mpfs-rtc
>   clk: microchip: mpfs: re-parent the configurable clocks
>   clk: microchip: mpfs: add RTCREF clock control
>   riscv: dts: microchip: reparent mpfs clocks
>
>  .../bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs.yaml        |  13 +-
>  .../bindings/rtc/microchip,mfps-rtc.yaml      |  15 +-
>  .../dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs-fabric.dtsi  |  16 +-
>  .../microchip/microchip-mpfs-icicle-kit.dts   |   2 +-
>  .../boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs.dtsi    |  10 +-
>  drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs.c              | 191 +++++++++++++++---
>  .../dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h  |   5 +-
>  7 files changed, 211 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

Thanks.  These generally look good to me, but I don't see acks from 
everyone.  I'm perfectly fine treating these as fixes and taking them 
through the RISC-V tree, but looks like it's mostly clk stuff so

Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at rivosinc.com>

in case someone else wants to take it.  I've put these over at 
palmer/riscv-pfsoc-clk but haven't merged that anywhere, I'll hold off 
until at least next week to give everyone time to chime in.

On a somewhat related note, I'm getting some DT schema failures 

    /scratch/riscv-systems-ci-fixes/check/dt_check/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs-icicle-kit.dtb: /: memory at 80000000: 'clocks' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
            From schema: /home/palmer/.local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dtschema-2022.3.2-py3.8.egg/dtschema/schemas/memory.yaml
    /scratch/riscv-systems-ci-fixes/check/dt_check/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs-icicle-kit.dtb: /: memory at 1000000000: 'clocks' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
            From schema: /home/palmer/.local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dtschema-2022.3.2-py3.8.egg/dtschema/schemas/memory.yaml
    /scratch/riscv-systems-ci-fixes/check/dt_check/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs-icicle-kit.dtb: soc: syscontroller: {'compatible': ['microchip,mpfs-sys-controller'], 'mboxes': [[15, 0]], 'status': ['okay']} should not be valid under {'type': 'object'}
            From schema: /home/palmer/.local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dtschema-2022.3.2-py3.8.egg/dtschema/schemas/simple-bus.yaml
    
Looks like none of them are new from this patch set, though.  Atul's 
been chasing down various DT schema failures so they might be fixed 
already.



More information about the linux-riscv mailing list