[PATCH v2] RISC-V: Add CONFIG_{NON,}PORTABLE
Niklas Cassel
Niklas.Cassel at wdc.com
Thu Apr 14 05:47:33 PDT 2022
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 06:40:10PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at rivosinc.com>
>
> The RISC-V port has collected a handful of options that are
> fundamentally non-portable. To prevent users from shooting themselves
> in the foot, hide them all behind a config entry that explicitly calls
> out that non-portable binaries may be produced.
>
> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at rivosinc.com>
>
> ---
>
> Changes since v1:
>
> * Fix a bunch of spelling mistakes.
> * Move NONPORTABLE under the "Platform type" sub-heading.
> * Fix the rv32i dependency.
> ---
> arch/riscv/Kconfig | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> index 5adcbd9b5e88..3d8eb44eb889 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> @@ -213,6 +213,21 @@ source "arch/riscv/Kconfig.erratas"
>
> menu "Platform type"
>
> +config NONPORTABLE
> + bool "Allow configurations that result in non-portable kernels"
> + help
> + RISC-V kernel binaries are compatible between all known systems
> + whenever possible, but there are some use cases that can only be
> + satisfied by configurations that result in kernel binaries that are
> + not portable between systems.
> +
> + Selecting N does not guarantee kernels will be portable to all knows
nit: s/knows/known ?
Kind regards,
Niklas
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list