[PATCH v3] dt-bindings: Fix phandle-array issues in the idle-states bindings

Palmer Dabbelt palmer at rivosinc.com
Fri Apr 1 15:26:34 PDT 2022


On Fri, 01 Apr 2022 14:39:24 PDT (-0700), Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 4:36 PM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at rivosinc.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at rivosinc.com>
>>
>> As per 39bd2b6a3783 ("dt-bindings: Improve phandle-array schemas"), the
>> phandle-array bindings have been disambiguated.  This fixes the new
>> RISC-V idle-states bindings to comply with the schema.
>>
>> Fixes: 1bd524f7e8d8 ("dt-bindings: Add common bindings for ARM and RISC-V idle states")
>> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at rivosinc.com>
>> ---
>> Changes since v2:
>>
>> * Add the missing schema requirement to riscv/cpus.yaml
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>>
>> * Only fix the RISC-V bindings, to avoid a merge conflict.
>>
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/cpu/idle-states.yaml     | 16 ++++++++--------
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml          |  2 ++
>>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
>
> Thanks for fixing quickly.

Well, sorry for breaking it.  I've got the DT checks running locally 
now, we've got a handful of errors in RISC-V land.  I'll clean those up 
and then get something blocking my merges, so stuff like this is less 
likely to happen.

Looks like Linus just merged my Part 2, I'll send along the Part 3 just 
containing this as a fix.



More information about the linux-riscv mailing list