[RESEND PATCH V3 1/2] dt-bindings: riscv: add mmu-supports-svpbmt for Svpbmt
Philipp Tomsich
philipp.tomsich at vrull.eu
Mon Oct 25 06:21:56 PDT 2021
On Mon, 25 Oct 2021 at 08:08, Anup Patel <anup at brainfault.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 11:30 AM Guo Ren <guoren at kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 12:17 PM Anup Patel <anup at brainfault.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 9:36 AM <wefu at redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Wei Fu <wefu at redhat.com>
> > > >
> > > > Previous patch has added svpbmt in arch/riscv and changed the
> > > > DT mmu-type. Update dt-bindings related property here.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Wei Fu <wefu at redhat.com>
> > > > Co-developed-by: Guo Ren <guoren at kernel.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren at kernel.org>
> > > > Cc: Anup Patel <anup at brainfault.org>
> > > > Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at dabbelt.com>
> > > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt at kernel.org>
> > > > ---
> > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml | 5 +++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml
> > > > index e534f6a7cfa1..76f324d85e12 100644
> > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml
> > > > @@ -59,6 +59,11 @@ properties:
> > > > - riscv,sv48
> > > > - riscv,none
> > > >
> > > > + mmu-supports-svpbmt:
> > > > + description:
> > > > + Describes the CPU's mmu-supports-svpbmt support
> > > > + $ref: '/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle'
> > >
> > > There were various proposals from different folks in the previous
> > > email threads.
> > >
> > > I think most of us were converging on:
> > > 1) Don't modify "mmu-type" DT property for backward
> > > compatibility
> > I agree. FuWei has followed that in the patch.
> >
> > > 2) Add boolean DT property "riscv,svpmbt" under
> > > "mmu" child DT node of each CPU DT node. Same will apply
> > > to boolean DT property "riscv,svnapot" as well.
> > We have various proposals here:
> > @Philipp suggests firstly, but break the backward compatibility:
> > cpu at 0 {
> > ...
> > mmu {
> > type = "riscv,sv39";
> > supports-svpbmt;
> > supports-svnapot;
> > };
> >
> > @guoren suggests reusing the mmu-type, but seems not clean.
> > cpu at 0 {
> > ...
> > mmu-type = "riscv,sv39,svpbmt,svnapot";
> >
> >
> > @fuwei suggests simple name property in CPU section:
> > cpu at 0 {
> > ...
> > mmu-type = "riscv,sv39";
> > mmu-supports-svpbmt;
> > mmu-supports-svnapot;
> >
> > @Anup suggests:
> > cpu at 0 {
> > ...
> > mmu-type = "riscv,sv39";
> > mmu {
> > supports-svpbmt;
> > supports-svnapot;
> > };
> >
> > Any other suggestions? Thx.
> >
> > >
> > > We also have bitmanip and vector broken down into smaller
> > > extensions so grouping related extensions as separate DT node
> > > under each CPU node will be more readable and easy to parse.
> > Do you mean combine mmu extensions with them together?
> > cpu at 0 {
> > ...
> > extensions {
> > supports-svpbmt;
> > supports-svnapot;
> > supports-bitmanip;
> > supports-vector-v0p7;
> > };
>
> I meant separate group nodes like this:
>
> cpu at 0 {
> ...
> mmu-type = "riscv,sv39";
> mmu { /* Only considered when mmu-type is present and mmu-type !=
> "riscv,sv32" */
> riscv,svpmbt;
> riscv,svnapot;
> };
>
> bitmanip { /* Only considered when "B" is present in the ISA string */
> ...
> };
Please disregard this comment regarding bitmanip/B.
The B bit in the misa CSR is not used for any signalling regarding
Zb[abcs] (or the other Zb-extensions), so this entire node is not
needed and B in the ISA string is not related to any of the Zb*
extensions).
All Zb* extensions are directly visible from the ISA string.
> vector { /* Only considered when "V" is present in the ISA string */
> ...
> };
> ...
> };
>
> Regards,
> Anup
>
> >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Anup
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > riscv,isa:
> > > > description:
> > > > Identifies the specific RISC-V instruction set architecture
> > > > --
> > > > 2.25.4
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards
> > Guo Ren
> >
> > ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list