[PATCH v2 09/16] reset: starfive-jh7100: Add StarFive JH7100 reset driver

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 8:43 PM Emil Renner Berthing <kernel at esmil.dk> wrote:
>
> Add a driver for the StarFive JH7100 reset controller.

...

> +config RESET_STARFIVE_JH7100
> +       bool "StarFive JH7100 Reset Driver"
> +       depends on SOC_STARFIVE || COMPILE_TEST

> +       depends on OF

No evidence of this dependency. Why to limit test coverage?

> +       default SOC_STARFIVE

...

> +/*
> + * Reset driver for the StarFive JH7100 SoC
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2021 Emil Renner Berthing <kernel at esmil.dk>

> + *

Redundant empty line.

> + */

...

> +#include <linux/of_device.h>

No evidence of any usage of this header. Perhaps you meant mod_devicetable.h?

...

> +static const u32 jh7100_reset_asserted[4] = {

> +       BIT(JH7100_RST_U74 % 32) |
> +       BIT(JH7100_RST_VP6_DRESET % 32) |
> +       BIT(JH7100_RST_VP6_BRESET % 32),

It's hard to notice that this is only one entry. See also below.

> +       BIT(JH7100_RST_HIFI4_DRESET % 32) |
> +       BIT(JH7100_RST_HIFI4_BRESET % 32),
> +
> +       BIT(JH7100_RST_E24 % 32)

+ Comma.

> +};

Why all these ugly % 32 against constants?

...

> +       if (!assert)
> +               done ^= mask;

Can you convert this to simple

  if (assert)
    ret = readl_...
  else
    ret = readl_...

below?

> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&data->lock, flags);
> +
> +       value = readl(reg_assert);
> +       if (assert)
> +               value |= mask;
> +       else
> +               value &= ~mask;
> +       writel(value, reg_assert);

> +       /* if the associated clock is gated, deasserting might otherwise hang forever */
> +       ret = readl_poll_timeout(reg_status, value, (value & mask) == done, 0, 1000);

You run delays under spin lock. You need to use _atomic variant.

> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&data->lock, flags);

...

> +       u32 value = (readl(reg_status) ^ jh7100_reset_asserted[offset]) & mask;

> +       dev_dbg(rcdev->dev, "status(%lu) = %d\n", id, !value);
> +       return !value;

Dup of ! operator. Can it be value = !(...); above?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko