[RESEND PATCH v2 1/2] ftrace: disable preemption between ftrace_test_recursion_trylock/unlock()
王贇
yun.wang at linux.alibaba.com
Wed Oct 13 01:11:10 PDT 2021
On 2021/10/13 下午3:55, Miroslav Benes wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/linux/trace_recursion.h b/include/linux/trace_recursion.h
>> index a9f9c57..101e1fb 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/trace_recursion.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/trace_recursion.h
>> @@ -208,13 +208,29 @@ static __always_inline void trace_clear_recursion(int bit)
>> * Use this for ftrace callbacks. This will detect if the function
>> * tracing recursed in the same context (normal vs interrupt),
>> *
>> + * The ftrace_test_recursion_trylock() will disable preemption,
>> + * which is required for the variant of synchronize_rcu() that is
>> + * used to allow patching functions where RCU is not watching.
>> + * See klp_synchronize_transition() for more details.
>> + *
>
> I think that you misunderstood. Steven proposed to put the comment before
> ftrace_test_recursion_trylock() call site in klp_ftrace_handler().
Oh, I see... thanks for pointing out :-)
>
>> * Returns: -1 if a recursion happened.
[snip]
>> }
>
> Side note... the comment will eventually conflict with peterz's
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210929152429.125997206@infradead.org/.
Steven, would you like to share your opinion on this patch?
If klp_synchronize_transition() will be removed anyway, the comments
will be meaningless and we can just drop it :-P
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
> Miroslav
>
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list