[PATCH v8 1/8] RISC-V: Enable CPU_IDLE drivers

Anup Patel anup at brainfault.org
Mon Oct 11 17:57:07 PDT 2021


On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 4:46 AM Heiko Stübner <heiko at sntech.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Anup,
>
> Am Montag, 11. Oktober 2021, 10:18:13 CEST schrieb Anup Patel:
> > We force select CPU_PM and provide asm/cpuidle.h so that we can
> > use CPU IDLE drivers for Linux RISC-V kernel.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel at wdc.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/riscv/Kconfig                |  7 +++++++
> >  arch/riscv/configs/defconfig      |  1 +
> >  arch/riscv/configs/rv32_defconfig |  1 +
> >  arch/riscv/include/asm/cpuidle.h  | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  arch/riscv/kernel/process.c       |  3 ++-
> >  5 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >  create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/cpuidle.h
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > index 8de2afb460f7..d02f1f5a2431 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ config RISCV
> >       select CLONE_BACKWARDS
> >       select CLINT_TIMER if !MMU
> >       select COMMON_CLK
> > +     select CPU_PM if CPU_IDLE
> >       select EDAC_SUPPORT
> >       select GENERIC_ARCH_TOPOLOGY if SMP
> >       select GENERIC_ATOMIC64 if !64BIT
> > @@ -564,5 +565,11 @@ source "kernel/power/Kconfig"
> >
> >  endmenu
> >
> > +menu "CPU Power Management"
> > +
> > +source "drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig"
> > +
> > +endmenu
> > +
> >  source "arch/riscv/kvm/Kconfig"
> >  source "drivers/firmware/Kconfig"
>
> another issue, the "arch/riscv/kvm/Kconfig" line above comes from a
> commit that is not in the riscv-tree at all but in the kvm-tree [0],
> making this patch fail to apply onto riscv/for-next alone.
>
> If you have multiple independent patch series in flight, like shown in
> the github branch you references, it might be easier to base each on
> top of the relevant branch cleanly and after one gets applied rebase
> the other ones.

I know I have been doing that but this time accidently picked the wrong
branch to rebase upon.

Thanks for trying.

Regards,
Anup

>
> That way you're not dependent on the others going in first and also
> people can test patch series individually without too much hassle.
>
> Thanks
> Heiko
>
>
> [0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/linux.git/commit/?h=next&id=99cdc6c18c2d815e940e81b9b477d469bdd41788
>
>



More information about the linux-riscv mailing list