[PATCH v20 00/17] KVM RISC-V Support
Paolo Bonzini
pbonzini at redhat.com
Tue Oct 5 00:37:27 PDT 2021
On 04/10/21 20:01, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>
> Just to make sure we're on the same page here, I've got
>
> commit 6c341a285912ddb2894ef793a58ad4f8462f26f4 (HEAD -> for-next)
> Merge: 08da1608a1ca 3f2401f47d29
> Author: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt at google.com>
> Date: Mon Oct 4 10:12:44 2021 -0700
> Merge tag 'for-riscv' of
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git into for-next
> H extension definitions, shared by the KVM and RISC-V trees.
> * tag 'for-riscv' of
> ssh://gitolite.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm: (301 commits)
> RISC-V: Add hypervisor extension related CSR defines
> KVM: selftests: Ensure all migrations are performed when test
> is affined
> KVM: x86: Swap order of CPUID entry "index" vs. "significant
> flag" checks
> ptp: Fix ptp_kvm_getcrosststamp issue for x86 ptp_kvm
> x86/kvmclock: Move this_cpu_pvti into kvmclock.h
> KVM: s390: Function documentation fixes
> selftests: KVM: Don't clobber XMM register when read
> KVM: VMX: Fix a TSX_CTRL_CPUID_CLEAR field mask issue
> selftests: KVM: Explicitly use movq to read xmm registers
> selftests: KVM: Call ucall_init when setting up in rseq_test
> KVM: Remove tlbs_dirty
> KVM: X86: Synchronize the shadow pagetable before link it
> KVM: X86: Fix missed remote tlb flush in rmap_write_protect()
> KVM: x86: nSVM: don't copy virt_ext from vmcb12
> KVM: x86: nSVM: test eax for 4K alignment for GP errata
> workaround
> KVM: x86: selftests: test simultaneous uses of V_IRQ from L1
> and L0
> KVM: x86: nSVM: restore int_vector in svm_clear_vintr
> kvm: x86: Add AMD PMU MSRs to msrs_to_save_all[]
> KVM: x86: nVMX: re-evaluate emulation_required on nested VM exit
> KVM: x86: nVMX: don't fail nested VM entry on invalid guest
> state if !from_vmentry
> ...
>
> into
> ssh://git@gitolite.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/palmer/linux.git
> for-next
> (I know that's kind of a confusing name, but it's what I've been using
> as my short-term staging branch so I can do all my tests before saying
> "it's on for-next").
>
> If that looks OK I can make it a touch more official by putting into the
> RISC-V tree.
Yes. All of the patches in there, except the last, are already in
Linus's tree.
Thank you,
Paolo
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list